Commons:Quality images candidates
These are the candidates for becoming quality images. This is not the same thing as featured pictures. If you want informal feedback on your photos, please ask at Commons:Photography critiques.
Purpose
[edit]The purpose of quality images is to encourage the people that are the foundation of Commons, the individual users who provide the unique images that expand this collection. While featured pictures identifies the absolute best of all the images loaded into Commons, Quality images sets out to identify and encourage users’ efforts in providing quality images to Commons. Additionally, quality images should be a place to refer other users to when explaining methods for improving an image.
Guidelines
[edit]All nominated images should be the work of Commons users.
For nominators
[edit]Below are the general guidelines for Quality images; more detailed criteria are available at Image guidelines.
Image page requirements
[edit]- Copyright status. Quality image candidates have to be uploaded to Commons under a suitable license. The full license requirements are at Commons:Copyright tags.
- Images should comply with all Commons policies and practices, including Commons:Photographs of identifiable people.
- Quality images shall have a meaningful file name, be properly categorized and have an accurate description on the file page in one or more languages. It is preferred, but not mandatory, to include an English description.
- No advertisements or signatures in image. Copyright and authorship information of quality images should be located on the image page and may be in the image metadata, but should not interfere with image contents.
Creator
[edit]- Proposed wording changes to specifically exclude AI generate media from being eligable for QI see discussion
Pictures must have been created by a Wikimedian in order to be eligible for QI status. This means that pictures from, for example, Flickr are ineligible unless the photographer is a Commons user. (Note that Featured Pictures do not have this requirement.) Photographical reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, made by Wikimedians, are eligible (and should be licensed PD-old according to the Commons guidelines). If an image is promoted despite not being the creation of a Wikimedian, the QI status should be removed as soon as the mistake is detected.
Technical requirements
[edit]More detailed criteria are available at Commons:Image guidelines.
Resolution
[edit]Bitmapped images (JPEG, PNG, GIF, TIFF) should normally have at least 2 megapixels; reviewers may demand more for subjects that can be photographed easily. This is because images on Commons may be printed, viewed on monitors with very high resolution, or used in future media. This rule excludes vector graphics (SVG) or computer-generated images that have been constructed with freely-licensed or open software programs as noted in the image's description.
Image quality
[edit]Digital images can suffer various problems originating in image capture and processing, such as preventable noise, problems with JPEG compression, lack of information in shadow or highlight areas, or problems with capture of colors. All these issues should be handled correctly.
Composition and lighting
[edit]The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting. Lighting and focus also contribute to the overall result; the subject should be sharp, uncluttered, and well-exposed.
Value
[edit]Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia and other projects.
How to nominate
[edit]Simply add a line of this form at the top of Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list Nominations section:
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ |}}
The description shouldn't be more than a few words, and please leave a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries.
If you are nominating an image by another Wikimedian, include their username in the description as below:
File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description (by [[User:USERNAME|USERNAME]]) --~~~~ |}}
Note: there is a Gadget, QInominator, which makes nominations quicker. It adds a small "Nominate this image for QI" link at the top of every file page. Clicking the link adds the image to a list of potential candidates. When this list is completed, edit Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list. At the top of the edit window a green bar will be displayed. Clicking the bar inserts all potential candidates into the edit window.
Number of nominations
[edit]No more than five images per day can be added by a single nominator.
Note: If possible, for every picture you nominate, please review at least one of the other candidates.
Evaluating images
[edit]Any registered user whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits, other than the author and the nominator, can review a nomination. For an easier evaluation you can activate the gadget QICvote
When evaluating images the reviewer should consider the same guidelines as the nominator.
How to review
[edit].svg)
Carefully review the image. Open it in full resolution, and check if the quality criteria are met.
- If you decide to promote the nomination, change the relevant line from
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}
to
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Promotion|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you liked it. --~~~~}}
In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Promotion and add your signature, possibly with some short comment.
- If you decide to decline the nomination, change the relevant line from
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Nomination|Very short description --~~~~ | }}
to
- File:ImageNameHere.jpg|{{/Decline|Very short description --Nominators signature |Why you didn't like it. --~~~~}}
In other words, change the template from /Nomination to /Decline and add your signature, possibly with a statement of the criteria under which the image failed (you can use titles of section from the guidelines). If there are many problems, please note only 2 or 3 of the most severe, or add multiple problems. When declining a nomination please do explain the reasons on the nominator’s talk page – as a rule, be nice and encouraging! In the message you should give a more detailed explanation of your decision.
Note: Please evaluate the oldest images first.
Grace period and promotion
[edit]If there are no objections within a period of 2 days (exactly 48 hours) from the first review, the image becomes promoted or fails according to the review it received. If you have objection, just change its status to Discuss and it will be moved to the Consensual review section.
How to execute decision
[edit]QICbot automatically handles this 2 days after a decision has been made, and promoted images are cached in Commons:Quality Images/Recently promoted awaiting categorization before their automatic insertion in to appropriate Quality images pages.
If you believe that you have identified an exceptional image that is worthy of Featured picture status then consider also nominating the image at Commons:Featured picture candidates.
Manual instructions (open only in cases of emergency)
If promoted,
- Add the image to appropriate group or groups of Quality images page. The image also needs to be added to the associated sub pages, only 3–4 of the newest images should be displayed on the main page.
- Add {{QualityImage}} template to the bottom of image description page.
- Move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 2025.
- Add the template {{File:imagename.jpg}} to the user’s talk page.
If declined,
- move the line with the image nomination and review to Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 2025.
- Images awaiting review show the nomination outlined in blue.
- Images the reviewer has accepted show the nomination outlined in green
- Images the reviewer has rejected show the nomination outlined in red
Unassessed images (nomination outlined in blue)
[edit]Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion, archived in Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives October 30 2025 and Category:Unassessed QI candidates added to the image.
Consensual review process
[edit]Consensual review is a catch all place used in the case the procedure described above is insufficient and needs discussion for more opinions to emerge.
How to ask for consensual review
[edit]To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day.
Please only send things to consensual review that have been reviewed as promoted/declined. If, as a reviewer, you cannot make a decision, add your comments but leave the candidate on this page.
Consensual review rules
[edit]See Commons:Quality images candidates#Rules
Page refresh: purge this page's cache
Nominations
[edit]Due to the Mediawiki parser code ~~~~ signatures will only work on this page if you have JavaScript enabled. If you do not have JavaScript enabled please manually sign with:
--[[User:yourname|yourname]] 21:45, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Please open a new date section if you are nominating an image after 0:00 o'clock (UTC)
- Please insert a blank line between your new entry and any existing entries
- Please help in reviewing "old" nominations here below first; many are still unassessed
- If you see terms with which you are unfamiliar, please see explanations at Photography terms
If you are not ready to Promote or Decline an image, you may leave a Comment instead.
If someone else has already promoted or declined an image and you disagree, you may cast an opposite voice or use Discuss — this will move the image to the Community Review section.
If you agree with a previous decision, there is no need to cast the same vote again, as doing so only delays the final closure of the nomination.
|
Please nominate no more than 5 images per day and try to review on average as many images as you nominate (check here to see how you are doing).
|
|---|
October 30, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: Cormorant on a branch above the Regnitz River --Ermell 20:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Aerial view of Dorgendorf --Ermell 20:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Aerial view of Dorgendorf --Ermell 20:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Aerial view of Dorgendorf --Ermell 20:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Aerial view of Dorgendorf --Ermell 20:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Porsche_911_Turbo_3.6%2C_Auto_2024%2C_Zurich_(PANA0363).jpg)
- Nomination: Porsche 911 Turbo 3.6 at Auto Zürich 2024 --MB-one 20:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Interboot_2023%2C_Friedrichshafen_(P1130324).jpg)
- Nomination: Aft detail of the hull of a Pointer 30 sailing yacht --MB-one 20:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-DB_Museum%2C_Nuremberg_(P1200930).jpg)
- Nomination: 141 248-5 electric locomotive at DB Museum Nürnberg --MB-one 20:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-VW_ID._Buzz%2C_IAA_Summit_2023%2C_Munich_(P1120216).jpg)
- Nomination: VW ID. Buzz at IAA Summit 2023 in Munich, Germany --MB-one 20:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Sagrada_Familia%2C_Barcelona_(P1170692).jpg)
- Nomination: View down from Basilica Sagrada Familia in Barcelona --MB-one 20:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Creek_in_Prospect_Park_(53554).jpg)
- Nomination Creek in Prospect Park, NYC --Rhododendrites 19:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:52, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Smoky_Mountains_panorama_(82683p).jpg)
- Nomination Smoky Mountains panorama --Rhododendrites 19:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 19:39, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-No_Kings_NYC_(84771).jpg)
- Nomination No Kings protest on 7th Avenue in Manhattan, NYC in October 2025 --Rhododendrites 19:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 19:38, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-No_Kings_NYC_(84726).jpg)
- Nomination No Kings protest on 7th Avenue in Manhattan, NYC in October 2025 --Rhododendrites 19:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 19:37, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-No_Kings_NYC_(84685).jpg)
- Nomination No Kings protest on 7th Avenue in Manhattan, NYC in October 2025 --Rhododendrites 19:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 19:36, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Reflecting pool, Jardim da Praça do Império, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:53, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Reflection in a rain puddle, Ponte Gonçalo Ribeiro Telles, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:53, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Playground floor, Jardim Marquês de Marialva, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:53, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Playground swing, Jardim Irmã Lúcia, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:53, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Playground swing and Gabriel's shadow, Jardim Irmã Lúcia, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:53, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Silene uniflora en Bretagne --JackyM59 18:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Jagiellonian_University_Collegium_Novum%2C_1882_designed_by_Feliks_Księżarski%2C_24_Gołębia_street%2C_Old_Town%2C_Kraków%2C_Poland_(2).jpg)
- Nomination Jagiellonian University Collegium Novum, 1882 designed by Feliks Księżarski, 24 Gołębia street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 17:38, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Jagiellonian_University_Collegium_Novum%2C_1882_designed_by_Feliks_Księżarski%2C_24_Gołębia_street%2C_Old_Town%2C_Kraków%2C_Poland_(3).jpg)
- Nomination: Jagiellonian University Collegium Novum, 1882 designed by Feliks Księżarski, 24 Gołębia street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 17:38, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Jagiellonian_University_Collegium_Novum%2C_1882_designed_by_Feliks_Księżarski%2C_24_Gołębia_street%2C_Old_Town%2C_Kraków%2C_Poland_(4).jpg)
- Nomination: Jagiellonian University Collegium Novum, 1882 designed by Feliks Księżarski, 24 Gołębia street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 17:38, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Jagiellonian_University_Collegium_Novum%2C_1882_designed_by_Feliks_Księżarski%2C_24_Gołębia_street%2C_Old_Town%2C_Kraków%2C_Poland_(5).jpg)
- Nomination: Jagiellonian University Collegium Novum, 1882 designed by Feliks Księżarski, 24 Gołębia street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 17:38, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Jagiellonian_University_Collegium_Novum%2C_1882_designed_by_Feliks_Księżarski%2C_24_Gołębia_street%2C_Old_Town%2C_Kraków%2C_Poland_(1).jpg)
- Nomination: Jagiellonian University Collegium Novum, 1882 designed by Feliks Księżarski, 24 Gołębia street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 17:38, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
It needs at least an additional cat --Poco a poco 18:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
@Poco a poco: I’ve filled in the category for this case and for all the photos above :) --Igor123121 19:10, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A small building in the protected landscape area Freisinger Moos und Echinger Gfild --FlocciNivis 13:43, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 14:47, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View down the Calle el Amparo in Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 13:43, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 14:47, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: View across the new danube channel to the lighthouse of Vienna --FlocciNivis 13:43, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
.svg/20px-Pictogram_voting_comment_(orange).svg.png)
Comment I like the photo, but I see some noise, could you fix it? --LexKurochkin 16:07, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Done --FlocciNivis 18:54, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cinquefoil and Mouse-ear Chickweed in the nature reserve Südliche Fröttmaninger Heide --FlocciNivis 13:43, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:34, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View acros the Inn to the church St. Michael and other buildings in Passau, Germany --FlocciNivis 13:43, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:35, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_14_(5).jpg)
- Nomination 14 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:32, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_14_(6).jpg)
- Nomination 14 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:30, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_14_(7).jpg)
- Nomination 14 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:31, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_15_(01).jpg)
- Nomination 15 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:33, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_15_(02).jpg)
- Nomination 15 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 16:43, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An image of a Tagetes erecta flower, known as the Marigold flower, in Borongan. --TheNuggeteer 13:12, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Oppose Blurry, sorry. --Lmbuga 16:42, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A spider seen in a crevice in Borongan, Philippines. --TheNuggeteer 13:12, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Spider not in focus. --E bailey 14:09, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Fou de Bassan en vol près de lîle Rouzic --JackyM59 12:53, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose What animal is it? Incorrectly categorised (Category:Morus bassanus?) and described. Details are missing, especially the essential ones, such as the head and what it is carrying in its mouth. At least noise, perhaps something else. White halo --Lmbuga 16:22, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
![* Nomination Phoque - archipel des Sept-îles en Bretagne] --JackyM59 12:53, 30 October 2025 (UTC) * Decline Oppose Inadequate quality --Lmbuga 16:37, 30 October 2025 (UTC)](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/56/Phoque_-_archipel_des_Sept-îles_en_Bretagne.jpg/120px-Phoque_-_archipel_des_Sept-îles_en_Bretagne.jpg)
-
- Nomination: Mosque El Shikh in Djerba in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 12:45, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
two dust spots (notes added). Fixable --George Chernilevsky 13:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mosque El Shikh in Djerba in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 12:45, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:59, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Mosque El Khouch in Djerba in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 12:45, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
It needs additional categories, what? where? --Poco a poco 18:08, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Mosque El Khouch in Djerba in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 12:45, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Saint_Vincent_church_in_Palmas_(14).jpg)
- Nomination Stained-glass window in the Saint Vincent church in Palmas, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 12:18, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --JackyM59 13:10, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Pigeonnier_de_Lagarde_(12).jpg)
- Nomination Pigeonnier de Lagarde in Compeyre, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 12:18, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:10, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Loc-Dieu_abbey_(66).jpg)
- Nomination Loc-Dieu abbey in commune of Martiel, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 12:18, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:10, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Saint_Julian_church_in_Le_Cambon_(27).jpg)
- Nomination Capitals of the portal of the Saint Julian church in Le Cambon, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 12:18, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:57, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Tour_de_Bonnefon_(1).jpg)
- Nomination Tour de Bonnefon in commune of Saint-Chély-d'Aubrac, Aveyron, France. --Tournasol7 12:18, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:58, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The portal of the Modarikhon Madrasah. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 11:29, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Pdanese 11:46, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Kukeldash Madrasah. Ornaments. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 11:29, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:08, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tach Khaouli. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 11:29, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Abdullah khan madrasa. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 11:29, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Abdullah khan madrasa. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 11:29, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:12, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Peugeot 504 Cabriolet at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 11:02, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:03, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_Classic-Gala_2025_DSC_1092.jpg/120px-Lexus_LS_400_(UCF20)_Classic-Gala_2025_DSC_1092.jpg)
- Nomination Lexus LS 400 (UCF20) at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 11:02, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:05, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aston Martin Lagonda Series 2 at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 11:02, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Panhard PL17 LG at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 11:02, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:08, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination BMW 501 A at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 11:02, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination White-tailed Deer. Cedar Hill Cemetery. Hartford, CT USA --Pdanese 10:56, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:55, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Female snapping turtle, closeup. Pleasant Valley Wildlife Sanctuary. Lenox, MA USA --Pdanese 10:56, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Small size, below 2 Megapixels. Also strong overprocessed --George Chernilevsky 11:54, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Great Egret. Matthaei Botanical Gardens. Ann Arbor, MI USA --Pdanese 10:56, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --TheNuggeteer 13:15, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wood Duck, overhead closeup. Keeney Cove. Glastonbury, CT USA --Pdanese 10:56, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion Oppose Interesting, but only eyes and top of the head are in focus. --Gower 16:41, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. I'd like this to be discussed. It's not going to win any awards & I know there is some subjectivity to QI, but I feel that the pic meets QI crtieria. --Pdanese 21:29, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Double-crested cormorant. Keeney Cove. Glastonbury, CT USA --Pdanese 10:56, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. I have added proper category. --LexKurochkin 15:49, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Shah-i-Zinda%2C_Samarkand_(Shohi-Zinda_majmuasi%2C_Samarqand%2C_Шахи_Зинда).jpg)
-
- Nomination: Schastok family tomb chapel, Bytom. --Gower 10:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Demolition of St. Joseph church in Bytom. --Gower 10:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Interior of IV Lyceum in Bytom. --Gower 10:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Arches_in_Gur-e_Amir%2C_Samarkand_(Amir_Temur_maqbarasi%2C_Гур-Эмир).jpg)
- Nomination Gate of Gur-e-Amir, Samarkand, UzbekistanI --PetarM 10:19, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:16, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Shah-i-Zinda%2C_Samarkand_(Shohi-Zinda_majmuasi%2C_Шахи_Зинда).jpg)
-
- Nomination Plaque ot the Santa Cruz Guesthouse. Rúa do Villar street, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 09:13, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:58, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of the staircase on the Obradoiro façade. Cathedral of Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 09:13, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 11:59, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Majolica tiled collumn of Ulugh Beg madrasa. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 08:40, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Better if you crop the shadow at the right border in the middle --Poco a poco 18:16, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Бухара%2C_медресе_Улугбека%2C_мозаика_(1).jpg)
- Nomination: Mosaic on the wall of Ulugh Beg madrasa. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 08:40, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
.jpg/120px-Бухара%2C_медресе_Улугбека%2C_мозаика_(2).jpg)
-
-
- Nomination Monument in memory of Ellis Walker, principal of Drogheda Grammar School in 1687–94. Located in St. Peter's Church of Ireland, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland --AFBorchert 08:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 08:20, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Robinson stone and brass in memory of Richard Robinson D.D., Archbishop of Armagh, located in the north wall of the north aisle in St. Peter's Church of Ireland, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland --AFBorchert 08:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 08:20, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination East window of St. Peter's Church of Ireland, Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland --AFBorchert 08:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. I love it --Lmbuga 08:20, 30 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 08:20, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ornament and coat of arms on the Obradoiro façade, Santiago de Compostela Cathedral, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 07:57, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 08:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ornament and coat of arms on the Obradoiro façade, Santiago de Compostela Cathedral, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 07:57, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 08:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Balcony between Rúa do Villar street and O Franco street. Santiago de Compostela. Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 07:57, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Petro Stelte 08:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mochlos island. Sitia, Crete, Greece. --Petro Stelte 07:39, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 08:19, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Zinnia. Sitia, Crete, Greece. --Petro Stelte 07:39, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 08:19, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mailbox in Mochlos. Sitia, Crete, Greece. --Petro Stelte 07:39, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:47, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cactaceae in Mochlos. The sea is in the background. Sitia, Crete, Greece. --Petro Stelte 07:39, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 08:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Agave in Mochlos. The sea is in the background. Sitia, Crete, Greece. --Petro Stelte 07:39, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:17, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_01.jpg/120px-Paris_8e_-_Palais_de_la_découverte_-_La_Poésie_et_la_Musique_(Raoul_Larche)_01.jpg)
- Nomination Allegorical statue of poetry and music --Romainbehar 07:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:43, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_51.jpg/120px-León_(Panthera_leo)%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_51.jpg)
- Nomination Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:27, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 08:08, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_30.jpg/120px-León_(Panthera_leo)%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_30.jpg)
- Nomination Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:27, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:05, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_23.jpg/120px-León_(Panthera_leo)%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_23.jpg)
- Nomination: Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:27, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
%2C_zona_de_conservación_de_Ngorongoro%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-27%2C_DD_63.jpg/120px-León_(Panthera_leo)%2C_zona_de_conservación_de_Ngorongoro%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-27%2C_DD_63.jpg)
- Nomination Lion (Panthera leo), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:27, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 08:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_53.jpg/120px-León_(Panthera_leo)%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_53.jpg)
- Nomination: Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:27, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_9_(11).jpg)
- Nomination 9 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko --Jacek Halicki 07:23, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 07:26, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_14_(1).jpg)
- Nomination 14 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:23, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 07:26, 30 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 07:27, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_14_(2).jpg)
- Nomination 14 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:23, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_14_(3).jpg)
- Nomination 14 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 07:23, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_14_(4).jpg)
- Nomination 14 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 4 --Jacek Halicki 07:23, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baratynsky Manor wing house, Gorky street 25, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 07:22, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The building of the former school for the deaf, Gorky street 22, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 07:22, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vasily Aksyonov house-museum, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 07:22, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Shuravina-Aleksandrova manor, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 07:22, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bolshaya Krasnaya street 63 house, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 07:22, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Round tower at Devenish Island, looking north-east in the evening light. By User:AFBorchert --Gower 07:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:18, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mâcon (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Town hall - Northwestern facade, on Saint Peter square --Benjism89 06:57, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:03, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mâcon (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Joseph Dufour street --Benjism89 06:57, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:03, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mâcon (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Saint Peter church - The nave viewed from the choir, with a cross and the green sheet of Ordinary Time --Benjism89 06:57, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:03, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mâcon (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Saint Peter church - Pulpit, mural, stained-glass windows and columns in the nave --Benjism89 06:57, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:03, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mâcon (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Renaissance window of a house in Saint Nizier street --Benjism89 06:57, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:03, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portrait of a juvenile Egyptian goose (Alopochen aegyptiaca). --Alexis Lours 06:48, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:54, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A great crested grebe (Podiceps cristatus) swimming. --Alexis Lours 06:48, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:53, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portrait of a common moorhen (Gallinula chloropus). --Alexis Lours 06:48, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:53, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: A carrion crow (Corvus corone) vocalising. --Alexis Lours 06:48, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Very good, but stone too bright and little CA to fix --Gower 07:09, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A carrion crow (Corvus corone) bathing. --Alexis Lours 06:48, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Very good quality. --Gower 07:11, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace --Llez 06:17, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:49, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Old tram depot and workshop, 1900 design. Karol Knaus, 15 św. Wawrzyńca street, Kazimierz, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 06:13, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:17, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Old tram depot and workshop, 1900 design. Karol Knaus, 15 św. Wawrzyńca street, Kazimierz, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 06:13, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Building of the Academy of Music in Kraków, 1921 design. Ludwik Wojtyczko, entry, 43 Świętego Tomasza street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 06:13, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Basilica of Our Lady of Perpetual Help, St. Mary Magdalene and St. Stanislaus the Bishop, Poznań, Poland --Igor123121 06:13, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Kraków, Dom Józefa MehofferaJa, właściciel praw autorskich do tego dzieła, udostępniam je na poniższej licencjiTa fotografia została przesłana w ramach projektu Wiki Lubi Zabytki będącego częścią inicjatywy Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Igor123121 06:13, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Pterocles indicus (Painted Sandgrouse) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:10, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:50, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pterocles indicus (Painted Sandgrouse) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:10, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:15, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pterocles indicus (Painted Sandgrouse) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:10, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:49, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Strix ocellata (Mottled Wood-Owl) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India --Tisha Mukherjee 06:10, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 06:51, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Strix ocellata (Mottled Wood-Owl) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:10, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Looks nice but I'm afraid that the focus is on the branch and the claws. The focus should have been on the eyes. --AFBorchert 08:19, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Doetinchem-NL, winmill: the Benninkmolen --Michielverbeek 06:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:21, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Doetinchem-NL, Silo Art - De Reizende Hond (The Travelling dog) --Michielverbeek 06:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:21, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Loil-NL, church: the Onze Lieve Vrouwekerk --Michielverbeek 06:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:19, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Greater flamingos (Phoenicopterus roseus) bottom-feeding, Massa River, Morocco --Tagooty 05:41, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose All three birds are too blured. Low level of detail. Sorry. --LexKurochkin 07:41, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination: Vintage ambulance in the "Basel Tattoo Parade 2025": Cadillac Ambulance by König Basel 1963. The vehicle has a 6383 cc V8 engine producing 270 hp. It was in service in Basel from 1963 to 1983. By --Ahmet Düz 05:39, 30 October 2025 (UTC) Comment A lot of CAs everywhere --Jakubhal 06:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: Vintage ambulance in the "Basel Tattoo Parade 2025": Cadillac Ambulance by König Basel 1963. The vehicle has a 6383 cc V8 engine producing 270 hp. It was in service in Basel from 1963 to 1983. By --Ahmet Düz 05:39, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ambulance in presence. Basel - Basel-Stadt Ambulance Service - RTW - Ambu 05, Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 518 CDI, body: Fahrtec. By --Ahmet Düz 05:39, 30 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:46, 30 October 2025 (UTC) Oppose A lot of strong CAs --Jakubhal 05:57, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion {{{2}}}
- Nomination Ambulance in presence. Basel - Basel-Stadt Ambulance Service - RTW - Ambu 05, Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 518 CDI, body: Fahrtec. By --Ahmet Düz 05:39, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Bunker 14 in the ammunition depot, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:16, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maintenance and machine hall in the ammunition depot, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:16, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion Oppose Sign is sharp but building is blurry. --Tagooty 05:46, 30 October 2025 (UTC) Comment The sign is the subject and therefore in focus. The building is intentionally blurred so that it is less distracting. Honestly, this is a very common technique. --XRay 07:13, 30 October 2025 (UTC) Support Ok for me. The subject seems to be the plaque, and it is perfectly sharp --Jakubhal 06:00, 30 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. Per others. --Sebring12Hrs 08:23, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Former US special ammunition depot, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:16, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:21, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bunker 14 in the ammunition depot, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:16, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
%2C_08-08-2025._(actm.)_01.jpg/120px-Klimhortensia_(Hydrangea_anomala_petiolaris)%2C_08-08-2025._(actm.)_01.jpg)
- Nomination Climbing hydrangea trunk and tendrils growing against a brick wall.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 30 October 2025 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 05:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Climbing hydrangea trunk and tendrils growing against a brick wall.
-
_04.jpg/120px-Motor_Tanker_RIVAGE._ENI_2104768%2C_16-06-2025._(actm.)_04.jpg)
- Nomination Motor Tanker RIVAGE. ENI 2104768. Location Groote Brekken. Princess Margriet Canal near the lock complex to the IJsselmeer.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:17, 30 October 2025 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 05:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Motor Tanker RIVAGE. ENI 2104768. Location Groote Brekken. Princess Margriet Canal near the lock complex to the IJsselmeer.
-
- Nomination View of the Tatra Mountains from Jaworzyna Krynicka in the Beskid Sądecki Mountains --Jakubhal 04:10, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View of the Tatra Mountains from Jaworzyna Krynicka in the Beskid Sądecki Mountains --Jakubhal 04:10, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:12, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Jaworzyna Krynica in the Beskid Sądecki Mountains --Jakubhal 04:10, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:24, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Hiking trail on Jaworzyna Krynicka in the Beskid Sądecki Mountains --Jakubhal 04:10, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Ehemaliger_Grenzstreifen_im_NSG_Alstergrund_(8).jpg)
-
.jpg/120px-Steinerlebnispfad_Zeilberg%2C_Gästebuch_am_Tierhotel_(1).jpg)
-
.jpg/120px-Schild_Kostenloses_Unkraut_zum_Selbstpflücken_bei_Jesserndorf_(2).jpg)
-
.jpg/120px-D-6-74-129-15_Schlosskirche_Gleisenau_2025_(2).jpg)
-
_2.jpg/120px-Bleilochstausee_(nördlicher_Teil)_2.jpg)
-
- Nomination Two fly agaric (Amanita muscaria) -- George Chernilevsky 03:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:13, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fly agaric (Amanita muscaria) -- George Chernilevsky 03:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:14, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maize field on a slope near the village of Mizyakiv. Ukraine -- George Chernilevsky 03:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:14, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maize field on a slope near the village of Mizyakiv. Ukraine (2) -- George Chernilevsky 03:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:14, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Golden Scalycap mushrooms (Pholiota aurivella) in clusters -- George Chernilevsky 03:28, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:15, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination German Boxer "Elmo vom Freudenreich", born 23/09/2019, brindle with white markings, 19 months old. Lying down in the "down/stay" position in Volkspark Friedrichshain, Berlin. --OleNeitzel 00:27, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:15, 30 October 2025 (UTC) Oppose Miscategorised: Category:Canidae could even be a fox or a coyote. No mention of breed. Category:Unidentified dogs? --Lmbuga 05:42, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination German Boxer "Elmo vom Freudenreich", born 23/09/2019, brindle with white markings, 2 years old. In motion (running with piece of wood) in Volkspark Friedrichshain, Berlin. --OleNeitzel 00:27, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose The snout is crucial, and its white area is blown out. The top of the head and temple are overprocessed. I think the image is overprocessed, and many of its white areas blown out. Miscategorised: Category:Canidae could even be a fox or a coyote. No mention of breed. Category:Unidentified dogs? -Lmbuga 05:25, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination German Boxer "Elmo vom Freudenreich", born 23/09/2019, brindle with white markings, 3 years old. Portrait in profile view. --OleNeitzel 00:27, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Sorry, too tight, not even the hairs on the snout are intact. Overprocessed IMO. Poor DoF, f/2.8. Miscategorised: Category:Canidae could even be a fox or a coyote. No mention of breed. Category:Unidentified dogs?--Lmbuga 05:31, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: German Boxer "Elmo vom Freudenreich", born 23/09/2019, brindle with white markings, 2 years old. Looking out from a tree stump in the forest. --OleNeitzel 00:27, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 08:16, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Miscategorised: Category:Canidae could even be a fox or a coyote. No mention of breed. Category:Unidentified dogs? --Lmbuga 14:10, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
![* Nomination Phoque - archipel des Sept-îles en Bretagne] --JackyM59 12:53, 30 October 2025 (UTC) * Decline Oppose Inadequate quality --Lmbuga 16:37, 30 October 2025 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Phoque_-_archipel_des_Sept-îles_en_Bretagne.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_Classic-Gala_2025_DSC_1092.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_01.jpg)
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-26,_DD_51.jpg)
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-26,_DD_30.jpg)
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-26,_DD_23.jpg)
,_zona_de_conservación_de_Ngorongoro,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_63.jpg)
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-26,_DD_53.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_08-08-2025._(actm.)_01.jpg)
_04.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_2.jpg)
October 29, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination Door in Casas Reais street, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain. --Lmbuga 23:08, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Could you make the details in the doorway brighter, please? I'm curious to know what's inside :) --Екатерина Борисова 23:20, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Done Thank you--Lmbuga 23:33, 29 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality, thank you. --Екатерина Борисова 23:41, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bench. Exterior of the church of San Martiño do Grove. Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 23:08, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 23:18, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pskov Kremlin (evening view), Pskov, Russia. By User:Елена Нечипоренко --Екатерина Борисова 22:49, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 23:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vologda Kremlin (morning view), Vologda, Russia. By User:Елена Нечипоренко --Екатерина Борисова 22:49, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 23:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_дворец_16.jpg/120px-Павловск%2C_Павловский_парк._Павловский_(Большой)_дворец_16.jpg)
- Nomination Pavlovsk Palace (view from Slavyanka river valley), Pavlovsk, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Игорь Гордеев --Екатерина Борисова 22:49, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 23:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Erminia statue in Pavlovsk Park, Pavlovsk, Saint Petersburg, Russia. By User:Игорь Гордеев --Екатерина Борисова 22:49, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rhododendron in Primorsky Park of Victory, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 22:49, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Pipe organ of Georgskirche in Ettlenschieß, Lonsee, Alb-Donau-Kreis, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Installed in 1965, Walcker Opus 4839, model “Positiv E”. --AFBorchert 22:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 23:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025%2C_Kraków%2C_Rakowice_Cemetery_(205).jpg)
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Rakowice Cemetery --Igor123121 22:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-2025%2C_Kraków%2C_Rakowice_Cemetery_(208).jpg)
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Rakowice Cemetery --Igor123121 22:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-2025%2C_Kraków%2C_Rakowice_Cemetery_(204).jpg)
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Rakowice Cemetery --Igor123121 22:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Archcathedral Basilica of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary and St. John the Baptist, Przemyśl, Poland --Igor123121 22:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Looks good but I think its perspective should be corrected (the right side is slightly leaning to the left). Please add also a proper description of the relief which appears to be in memory of Jan Wojciech Balicki. --AFBorchert 22:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_female_head_Chiloe.jpg/120px-Southern_pudu_(Pudu_puda)_female_head_Chiloe.jpg)
- Nomination: Southern pudu (Pudu puda) female --Charlesjsharp 21:53, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Are you sure about the white balance of these pudu pictures? Seems too cold/blue to me, but I'm not sure. --Plozessor 05:11, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_female_Chiloe.jpg/120px-Southern_pudu_(Pudu_puda)_female_Chiloe.jpg)
- Nomination: Southern pudu (Pudu puda) female --Charlesjsharp 21:53, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
_male_Chiloe.jpg/120px-Southern_pudu_(Pudu_puda)_male_Chiloe.jpg)
- Nomination: Southern pudu (Pudu puda) male --Charlesjsharp 21:53, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Turkey tail mushroom (Trametes versicolor) -- George Chernilevsky 21:46, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:38, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fly agaric (Amanita muscaria) -- George Chernilevsky 21:46, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Nice mushroom, but only cap edge is sharp. --Gower 16:37, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fly agaric (Amanita muscaria) (2) -- George Chernilevsky 21:46, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 23:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maize field on a slope near the village of Mizyakiv. Ukraine -- George Chernilevsky 21:46, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 23:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Golden Scalycap mushrooms (Pholiota aurivella) in clusters -- George Chernilevsky 21:46, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 23:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_male_Vicente_Lopez.jpg/120px-Argentine_black_and_white_tegu_(Salvator_merianae)_male_Vicente_Lopez.jpg)
- Nomination Argentine black and white tegu (Salvator merianae) male --Charlesjsharp 21:40, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_Costanera_Norte.jpg/120px-Hilaire’s_side-necked_turtle_(Phrynops_Hilarii)_Costanera_Norte.jpg)
- Nomination Hilaire’s side-necked turtle (Phrynops Hilarii) --Charlesjsharp 21:40, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:47, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Motortreff_Bella_Italia_2024%2C_Munich_(P1190254).jpg)
- Nomination Lancia Delta Integrale at Motortreff Bella Italia 2024 at Motorworld Munich --MB-one 21:39, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 23:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Monument%2C_Lisbon_(DSC03455).jpg)
-
.jpg/120px-El_Camino%2C_BAS_24%2C_Brussels_(P1170193-RR).jpg)
- Nomination Chevrolet El Camino SS at Brussels Auto Show 2024 --MB-one 21:39, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 23:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-WikiCon_2023%2C_Linz_(P1130900-RR).jpg)
- Nomination Opening session of WikiCon 2023 in Linz, Austria --MB-one 21:39, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 23:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-D-HADT%2C_ILA_2024%2C_Schoenefeld_(ILA43979).jpg)
-
- Nomination Building in Teresina, Piauí, Brazil --Boaventuravinicius 20:58, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Too blurry, lacks detail. --Gower 16:37, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lobnoye mesto - Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 20:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Lobnoye mesto - Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 20:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Could you improve the top crop? --Poco a poco 21:28, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Hi. Sadly no, this is only version I have. I've cropped to focus the main object of the photo. I think this may work here. Thank. --Юрий Д.К. 16:54, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Teatralny fountain - Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 20:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Looks like tilted to the right, otherwise good. --Екатерина Борисова 22:58, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Teatralny fountain - Moscow --Юрий Д.К. 20:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:28, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination crafts at the meeting point between the Parnaiba and Poty rivers, Teresina, Brazil --Boaventuravinicius 20:13, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Too blurry, not sharp enough, sorry. --Gower 16:37, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Felis catus, 2025 --Boaventuravinicius 20:13, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Not in focus, noisy, CA --Poco a poco 21:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_3.jpg/120px-Stolberg_(September_2025)_3.jpg)
- Nomination: View of Stolberg with castle and church of St. Martini --Romzig 19:47, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 22:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_6.jpg/120px-Burg_Regenstein_(Oktober_2024)_6.jpg)
-
_1.jpg/120px-Wörlitz%2C_St-Petrikirche_(September_2023)_1.jpg)
- Nomination St. Peter's Church in Wörlitz: View of the altar --Romzig 19:47, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Lacks detail, sorry --Poco a poco 21:32, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_3.jpg/120px-Brauner_Feuerfalter_(September_2025)_3.jpg)
-
_4.jpg/120px-Hohegeiß_(September_2025)_4.jpg)
- Nomination: Hiking trail along the valley of the Dicken Tannen near Hohegeiß in the Harz Mountains --Romzig 19:47, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Looks ok but it needs a more specific category than an area. Hint: it looks like a forest... --Poco a poco 21:32, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gasr MednineCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-39.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 18:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:23, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gasr MednineCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-39.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 18:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Gower 16:37, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Grumman F9F Cougar at Intrepid Sea-Air-Space Museum, NYC (by Jakubhal) --Sebring12Hrs 17:27, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 23:15, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Homelessness cardboard boxes, Avenida Guerra Junqueiro, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 17:27, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:31, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Group of friends seen through iron railings, Biblioteca das Galveias, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 17:27, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 21:50, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_on_a_leaf%2C_Lisbon%2C_Portugal_(approx._GPS_location)_julesvernex2.jpg/120px-Green_peach_aphid_(Myzus_persicae)_on_a_leaf%2C_Lisbon%2C_Portugal_(approx._GPS_location)_julesvernex2.jpg)
- Nomination Green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) on a leaf, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 17:27, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_on_a_stem%2C_Lisbon%2C_Portugal_(approx._GPS_location)_julesvernex2.jpg/120px-Green_peach_aphid_(Myzus_persicae)_on_a_stem%2C_Lisbon%2C_Portugal_(approx._GPS_location)_julesvernex2.jpg)
- Nomination Green peach aphid (Myzus persicae) on a stem, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 17:27, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Brynek palace gatehouse. --Gower 16:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bytom, Assumption church. --Gower 16:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Coke plant in Bytom. --Gower 16:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sculpture „Skalary” by S. Hochuł in Bytom. --Gower 16:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
-
- Nomination A photo of Toyama Station taken in the evening, with a local bus in frame.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license: --Davekern 16:42, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 22:15, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The former wash house Lavaderos El bebedero de la furnia in Icod de los Vinos --FlocciNivis 15:54, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:41, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from the Calle el Barranco up to the over 300 years old Dracaena draco tree, named Drago de San Antonio, in Icod de los Vinos, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 15:54, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Maybe more space above would have been better, and the sky is not appealing. However, the quality is good, and the subject interesting. Thanks. --Harlock81 19:12, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Tabaiba Alta in El Rosario, Tenerife, Spain, on the Atlantic Ocean. The island Gran Canaria is visible at the horizont --FlocciNivis 15:54, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Gower 17:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hollowroot in the FFH-area Isarauen von Unterföhring bis Landshut in Marzling --FlocciNivis 15:54, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 18:43, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ships at the Lake Tegel. The biggest of them is the Jugendforschungsschiff Cormoran --FlocciNivis 15:54, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:05, 29 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Gower 17:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
-
_01.jpg/120px-IndiGo_Airbus_A320-251N_-_VT-IXA_at_Maharaja_Bir_Bikram_Airport_(IXA)_01.jpg)
- Nomination: IndiGo Airbus A320-251N - VT-IXA at Maharaja Bir Bikram Airport, Agartala, Tripura --Herpking 15:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 22:31, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Black-headed Ibis preening from Purbasthali, Burdwan --Herpking 15:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Not sharp, red CAs... --Sebring12Hrs 22:31, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Peru pavilion at Kolkata Book Fair 2014 --Herpking 15:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Not sharp, CAs, perspective... --Sebring12Hrs 22:31, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Saraisky Beach in Olkhon Island, Lake Baikal. --Argenberg 14:53, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:08, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination: Stična settlement with abbey in central position- --Miha Peče 13:43, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Emaus Methodist Church, Flint --BigDom 13:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 14:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination: Flint Town Hall --BigDom 13:03, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
I think it's very good, but the perspective correction could be a little less because the vertical lines on the sides of the building are bent outwards. --Lmbuga 13:35, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Good spot. I don't have access to LR at the moment so might have to leave this nomination for now and try again in future. --BigDom 20:31, 29 October 2025 (UTC) Comment With BigDom's permission, I have corrected the perspective myself. Done. Since I did it myself, I should not promote it. I kindly request that another user review it. Thank you. --Lmbuga 22:54, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2024 Ferrari 12 Cilindri --TTTNIS 12:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Rear view of 2024 Ferrari 12 Cilindri --TTTNIS 12:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 2013 Ferrari LaFerrari --TTTNIS 12:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Rear view of 2013 Ferrari LaFerrari --TTTNIS 12:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination 1968 Datsun Fairlady 1600 --TTTNIS 12:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wing foiler, Rondeau Bay, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 11:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Slight noise is visible in the sky, but OK --LexKurochkin 12:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Peter's Catholic Church, Tilbury, Ontario, 2025-07-06; sculpture of crucifixion in cemetery --Crisco 1492 11:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Peter's Catholic Church, Tilbury, Ontario, 2025-07-06; rose window --Crisco 1492 11:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Peter's Catholic Church, Tilbury, Ontario, 2025-07-06; corner stone --Crisco 1492 11:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunshine Drugs, Blenheim, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 11:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_13_(4).jpg)
- Nomination 13 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:41, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 12:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_13_(5).jpg)
- Nomination 13 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:41, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Pdanese 11:50, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_13_(6).jpg)
- Nomination 13 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:41, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_9_(09).jpg)
- Nomination 9 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:41, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 14:17, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_9_(10).jpg)
- Nomination 9 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 11:41, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 14:18, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of the staircase on the Obradoiro façade. Cathedral of Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 11:40, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 12:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Detail of the staircase on the Obradoiro façade. Cathedral of Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 11:40, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 12:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Great Blue Heron. Wethersfield Covel Wethersfield, CT USA --Pdanese 11:32, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support I'd have gone with a wide crop at the bottom, but good quality. --Crisco 1492 12:03, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Portrait of a juvenile Egyptian goose (Alopochen aegyptiaca). --Alexis Lours 10:25, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Pdanese 11:27, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A great crested grebe (Podiceps cristatus) swimming. --Alexis Lours 10:25, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --JackyM59 11:08, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A great crested grebe (Podiceps cristatus) swimming. --Alexis Lours 10:25, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A carrion crow (Corvus corone). --Alexis Lours 10:25, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:38, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A juvenile herring gull (Larus argentatus) in flight. --Alexis Lours 10:25, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Slightly soft, but given the difficulty of the shot I feel like it's acceptable. --Crisco 1492 12:03, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Borovitskaya tower from Sofia embankment --Юрий Д.К. 09:44, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 11:53, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ksar El Krikriya in Mednine in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 09:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ksar El Krikriya in Mednine in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 09:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. Very nice, but I miss more light. --Lmbuga 12:15, 29 October 2025 (UTC) dear Lmbuga Thank you and I will enlighten it more --IssamBarhoumi 12:43, 29 October 2025 (UTC) *:: dear @Lmbuga I improved the light--IssamBarhoumi 22:34, 29 October 2025 (UTC) Support Thak you --Lmbuga 14:15, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ksar El Mhadha in Mednine in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 08:22, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ksar El Mhadha in Mednine in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 08:22, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
underexposed, too dark. Also distorted and tilted--George Chernilevsky 10:33, 29 October 2025 (UTC) dear George Chernilevsky for the light I have to explain somethings about this buildings named Ksar in Tunisia they are warehouses for wheat olive oil and goods the aim of this photo is to frame parts of the building through a door of one warehouse generally the door is not a perfect shape of a door that is why is dark in the border an for the tilt I will correct it --IssamBarhoumi 12:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC) *:: dear @George Chernilevsky I improved the light and fixed the tilt --IssamBarhoumi 22:34, 29 October 2025 (UTC) Support It's still a bit dark for my taste, but the quality is acceptable. Good sharpness. --George Chernilevsky 06:47, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ksar El Mhadha in Mednine in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 08:22, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
underexposed, too dark. Also distorted and tilted--George Chernilevsky 10:33, 29 October 2025 (UTC) George Chernilevsky for the light I have to explain somethings about this buildings named Ksar in Tunisia they are warehouses for wheat olive oil and goods the aim of this photo is to frame parts of the building through a door of one warehouse generally the door is not a perfect shape of a door that is why is dark in the border an for the tilt I will correct it --IssamBarhoumi 12:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC) *:: dear @George Chernilevsky I improved the light and fixed the tilt --IssamBarhoumi 22:34, 29 October 2025 (UTC) Support It's still a bit dark for my taste, but the quality is acceptable. Good sharpness. --George Chernilevsky 06:47, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Islam Khodja madrasa and minaret. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 08:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:17, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Islam Khodja madrasa and minaret. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 08:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Pdanese 11:14, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ismail Samani Mausoleum. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 08:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:18, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Octogonal Pavilion of Sitori-i-Mokhi Khosa palace. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 08:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Pdanese 11:23, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Octogonal Pavilion of Sitori-i-Mokhi Khosa palace. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 08:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Gower 17:14, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_22.jpg/120px-León_(Panthera_leo)%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_22.jpg)
- Nomination Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Excellent - the photo tells the story of the landscape. --Herpking 15:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_29.jpg/120px-León_(Panthera_leo)%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_29.jpg)
- Nomination Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Herpking 15:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-27%2C_DD_04.jpg/120px-León_(Panthera_leo)%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-27%2C_DD_04.jpg)
- Nomination Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:51, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
%2C_zona_de_conservación_de_Ngorongoro%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-27%2C_DD_12.jpg/120px-León_(Panthera_leo)%2C_zona_de_conservación_de_Ngorongoro%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-27%2C_DD_12.jpg)
- Nomination Lion (Panthera leo), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 07:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-27%2C_DD_10.jpg/120px-León_(Panthera_leo)%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-27%2C_DD_10.jpg)
- Nomination Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Peulle 07:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - View of the remains of the abbey church (and recent buildings) from what used to be the entrance of the narthex. The abbey church was, from 13th to 15th century, the largest religious building in Western Christianity --Benjism89 07:17, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - View from the Cheeses Tower - The abbey palace of Jack of Amboise, current town hall --Benjism89 07:17, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Art and Archeology Museum, located inside the former Abbey palace - Part of the frieze of the abbey church narthex --Benjism89 07:17, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Art and Archeology Museum, located inside the former Abbey palace - Keystone of the narthex, depîcting the Easter lamb --Benjism89 07:17, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_7_(1).jpg)
- Nomination 7 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:23, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_7_(4).jpg)
- Nomination 7 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Benjism89 07:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_13_(1).jpg)
- Nomination 13 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 07:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Benjism89 07:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_13_(2).jpg)
- Nomination 13 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 07:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:58, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_13_(3).jpg)
- Nomination 13 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 07:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:58, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Aerial view of Autenhausen --Ermell 06:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_Tiger-20240526-RM-171242.jpg/120px-Eicher_EM200_(1958)_Tiger-20240526-RM-171242.jpg)
- Nomination Eicher EM200 (1958) Tiger with Rasspe cutter bar --Ermell 06:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fendt 716 Vario with Güttler prism roller on a field in Franconian Switzerland --Ermell 06:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-20251022-RM-172351.jpg/120px-Kreuzsporiger_Rötling_(Entoloma_conferendum)-20251022-RM-172351.jpg)
- Nomination Entoloma conferendum mushroom in the Bruderwald forest in Bamberg --Ermell 06:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:08, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sandstone column near Unterstürmig --Ermell 06:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:08, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_01.jpg/120px-Lyon_1er_-_Musée_des_Beaux-Arts_-_Escalier_Thomas_Blanchet_-_La_Saône_(Nicolas_Coustou)_01.jpg)
- Nomination Allegorical statue of a river --Romainbehar 06:45, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:23, 29 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Benjism89 07:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Sandetsky palace park, Karl Marx street 64, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Apartment building, Mushtari street 30, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:54, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: House, Gorky street 23, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Is this an embassy building? --Ermell 08:54, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Yes, It is Consulate General of Turkey in Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 09:52, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: "Kapry" residential building, Gorky street 27, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Very distorted, and this leaf in upper left is disturbing. --Екатерина Борисова 23:05, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baratynsky Manor main house, Gorky street 25A, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 23:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Hotel at 4, Khoja Porso street, Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 06:19, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 15:05, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Maghoki Attori mosque. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 06:19, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Distorted and looks a bit unnatural + dust spot near right turret. --Екатерина Борисова 23:08, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
.jpg/120px-Бухара%2C_люк_на_Захидова_(1).jpg)
-
.jpg/120px-Бухара%2C_люк_на_Захидова_(2).jpg)
- Nomination Manhole cover at Zakhidov street. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 06:19, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Harreveld-NL, windmill: molen Hermien --Michielverbeek 06:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --JackyM59 07:25, 29 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Benjism89 07:27, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Harreveld-NL, windmill: molen Hermien --Michielverbeek 06:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Benjism89 07:27, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Varsseveld-NL, windmill: molen De Engel --Michielverbeek 06:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Argenberg 14:51, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Varsseveld-NL, windmill: molen De Engel --Michielverbeek 06:10, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Gower 17:14, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Grey Plover (Pluvialis squatarola), Massa River, Souss-Massa National Park, Morocco --Tagooty 06:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:17, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Intermediate egret (Ardea intermedia), Massa River, Souss-Massa National Park, Morocco --Tagooty 06:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Ouirgane village and Yacoub el Mansour dam from SE, Al Haouz, Morocco --Tagooty 06:01, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 10:41, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Black-necked Stork (Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus) in Kaziranga National Park, Assam, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:49, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Black-necked Stork (Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus) in Kaziranga National Park, Assam, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:49, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. Useful to make the description more precise "... with fish in beak". Also CAT for left-facing or right-facing bird. --Tagooty 06:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Black-necked Stork (Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus) in Kaziranga National Park, Assam, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:49, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Not sharp enough. Sorry. --LexKurochkin 14:22, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Black-necked Stork (Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus) in Kaziranga National Park, Assam, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:49, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --JackyM59 07:25, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Black-necked Stork (Ephippiorhynchus asiaticus) in Kaziranga National Park, Assam, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:49, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. Useful to make the description more precise "... standing in water". Also CAT for left-facing or right-facing bird. --Tagooty 06:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_11.jpg/120px-Natuurgebied_Groote_Zand_in_Boswachterij_Hooghalen._18-08-2025._(actm.)_11.jpg)
- Nomination Flowering heather in heathland in Groote Zand nature reserve in Hooghalen Forestry.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC) - Promotion Good quality. --Llez 05:41, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Flowering heather in heathland in Groote Zand nature reserve in Hooghalen Forestry.
-
.jpg/120px-Norderney%2C_Promenade%2C_Feld_L_--_2025_--_9016_(bw).jpg)
- Nomination Sign for the beach chair field L, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:11, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
.jpg/120px-Norderney%2C_Strand_--_2025_--_8977_(bw).jpg)
- Nomination: Sea foam washed up on the beach, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-St_Martial_church_in_Contigny_(13).jpg)
- Nomination Bell tower of the Saint Martial church in Contigny, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 04:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:34, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-St_Leodegar_chapel_of_the_La_Palice_Castle_(3).jpg)
- Nomination Saint Leodegar chapel of the La Palice Castle in Lapalisse, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 04:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:13, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Castle_of_La_Palice_(2).jpg)
- Nomination La Palice Castle in Lapalisse, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 04:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:14, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Sts_Gervasius_%26_Protasius_church_in_Le_Montet_(7).jpg)
- Nomination Portal of the Saints Gervasius and Protasius church in Le Montet, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 04:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:34, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Saint_Martin_church_in_Meillard_(1).jpg)
- Nomination Saint Martin church in Le Montet, Allier, France. --Tournasol7 04:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:34, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tropsztyn Castle overlooking Czchów Lake, Wytrzyszczka, Lesser Poland Voivodeship --Jakubhal 04:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tropsztyn Castle overlooking Czchów Lake, Wytrzyszczka, Lesser Poland Voivodeship --Jakubhal 04:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:26, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Großer_Hornausee_von_der_östlichen_Ecke_(1).jpg)
-
- Nomination Saint Michael church in Leuzendorf --Plozessor 03:15, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:26, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
.jpg/120px-Blick_über_ND-05460_Feuchtwiese_am_Sauknock_(Panorama_von_Norden).jpg)
-
.jpg/120px-D-6-74-147-150_Pfarrkirche_Augsfeld_Chor_Altar_(2).jpg)
_дворец_16.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_female_head_Chiloe.jpg)
_female_Chiloe.jpg)
_male_Chiloe.jpg)
_male_Vicente_Lopez.jpg)
_Costanera_Norte.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_3.jpg)
_6.jpg)
_1.jpg)
_3.jpg)
_4.jpg)
_on_a_leaf,_Lisbon,_Portugal_(approx._GPS_location)_julesvernex2.jpg)
_on_a_stem,_Lisbon,_Portugal_(approx._GPS_location)_julesvernex2.jpg)
_01.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-26,_DD_22.jpg)
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-26,_DD_29.jpg)
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_04.jpg)
,_zona_de_conservación_de_Ngorongoro,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_12.jpg)
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_10.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_Tiger-20240526-RM-171242.jpg)
-20251022-RM-172351.jpg)
_01.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_11.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
October 28, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination Exterior details of Kronstadt Naval Cathedral, Kronstadt, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:56, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Pdanese 00:39, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Exterior details of Kronstadt Naval Cathedral, Kronstadt, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:56, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Gower 17:14, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Exterior details of Kronstadt Naval Cathedral, Kronstadt, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:56, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
This looks good but I think some perspective correction should be applied here. --AFBorchert 08:32, 29 October 2025 (UTC) Done, thanks for your review. --Екатерина Борисова 23:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
I am sorry but I do not think that the PC problem has been fixed. --AFBorchert 08:23, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Lantern of Gostiny Dvor building in Kronstadt, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:56, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Petunia in Ekaterininsky park, Kronstadt, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:56, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Gothic 14th-century wall paintings with scenes of the passion in Georgskirche Ettlenschieß, Lonsee, Alb-Donau-Kreis, Baden-Württemberg, Germany --AFBorchert 23:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lvova 09:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gothic 14th-century wall paintings with scenes of the passion in Georgskirche Ettlenschieß, Lonsee, Alb-Donau-Kreis, Baden-Württemberg, Germany --AFBorchert 23:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gothic 14th-century wall paintings with scenes of the passion in Georgskirche Ettlenschieß, Lonsee, Alb-Donau-Kreis, Baden-Württemberg, Germany --AFBorchert 23:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Gothic 14th-century wall paintings with scenes of the passion in Georgskirche Ettlenschieß, Lonsee, Alb-Donau-Kreis, Baden-Württemberg, Germany --AFBorchert 23:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Burg Eltz, Mai 2021 --Brackenheim 23:07, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Nice composition. However, I see significant CA in the leaves at the top. Could this be fixed? --AFBorchert 23:21, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Spoon-leaved aeonium in the Reserva Natural Especial del Chinyero close to the road TF-373 --FlocciNivis 22:52, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Soluta Mountain Tea in the Garden of the El Portillo Visitor Center in Los Realejos, Tenerife, Spain --FlocciNivis 22:52, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Stolperstein dedicated to Olga Adler (born Fürth) and Siegfried Adler, parents of Kurt Adler, in Vienna --FlocciNivis 22:52, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Pdanese 23:18, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A bridge in the München Nord Rangierbahnhof --FlocciNivis 22:52, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Light is a bit dull, but overall good quality IMO --Екатерина Борисова 00:52, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Water plants the Victoria House of the Botanical Garden in Munich. Among them is a Nymphaea rubra Red Flare --FlocciNivis 22:52, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 23:23, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gasr JouamaaCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-37.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 21:27, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Gower 17:14, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ksar El MhadhaCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-72.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 21:27, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Not sharp enough --Michielverbeek 06:21, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ksar El MhadhaCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-72.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 21:27, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Underexposed and not sharp, sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 00:04, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination False turkey tail (Stereum hirsutum) close-up -- George Chernilevsky 20:48, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:10, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination False turkey tail (Stereum hirsutum) on a stub -- George Chernilevsky 20:48, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:10, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Orange milkcap (Lactarius deterrimus) in basket (1) -- George Chernilevsky 20:48, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 20:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Orange milkcap (Lactarius deterrimus) in basket (2) -- George Chernilevsky 20:48, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 20:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Detail of the staircase on the Obradoiro façade. Cathedral of Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 19:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 20:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fence and balcony, Rúa do Villar street, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 19:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:59, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Graffiti painted tram front light, Calçada do Lavra, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Pdanese 18:51, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Graffiti on walls and park bench, Calçada do Lavra, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:59, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Graffiti on walls and park bench, Calçada do Lavra, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 19:00, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Graffiti on stone steps, Calçada do Lavra, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Noticed a bit of chromatic aberration, took the liberty to upload a corrected version --Julesvernex2 19:13, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_trunk%2C_Estufa_Fria%2C_Lisbon%2C_Portugal_julesvernex2.jpg/120px-Golden_cane_palm_(Dypsis_lutescens)_trunk%2C_Estufa_Fria%2C_Lisbon%2C_Portugal_julesvernex2.jpg)
- Nomination Golden cane palm (Dypsis lutescens) trunk, Estufa Fria, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Kaltaminor%2C_Khiva_(Минарет_Кальта_минар).jpg)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Rover 16 P2 sports tourer at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 17:52, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 17:56, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Riley Nine Gamecock at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 17:52, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 17:56, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination McLaren 620R at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 17:52, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 18:44, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ferrari Testarossa at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 17:52, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 18:44, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow II at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 17:52, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 18:44, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Elżbieta shaft complex in Chorzów. --Gower 16:54, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 23:25, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination: Facade of VI Lyceum in Katowice. --Gower 16:54, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review Comment @Gower I know K-5 can make very sharp pictures and good QI. Something went wrong here, lens ? --PetarM 18:42, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
@PetarM, thanks. Lens is, in fact, cheap (Irix 11 mm) and sometimes tricky. --Gower 19:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Planetarium Śląskie in Chorzów. --Gower 16:54, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Not sharp enough --Michielverbeek 06:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Cerfs-volants Berck 2025 --JackyM59 16:54, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Castle of Brolio - Gate with a lateral lion. -- Argentieri.Andrea 16:04, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Argentieri.Andrea
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Pdanese 16:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Male Red-winged blackbird. Ford Lake. Ypsilanti, MI USA --Pdanese 14:57, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 15:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A male Chiloé wigeon in Punta Arenas, Chile --Polinova 14:40, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 15:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A Clark's nutcracker seen at Crater Lake National Park --Polinova 14:40, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 15:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination An adult California gull in breeding plumage near Mono Lake, California --Polinova 14:40, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 15:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_5_(3).jpg)
- Nomination 5 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko by User:Jacek Halicki --Boston9 13:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 15:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination 5a Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --AFBorchert 23:27, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_6_(01).jpg)
- Nomination 6 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:02, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_6_(02).jpg)
- Nomination 6 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 2 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 15:50, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_6_(03).jpg)
- Nomination 6 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 3 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 13:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lvova 09:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
_in_shelter%2C_Rondeau_Provincial_Park%2C_Ontario%2C_2025-07-06_03.jpg/120px-Purple_Martin_(Progne_subis)_in_shelter%2C_Rondeau_Provincial_Park%2C_Ontario%2C_2025-07-06_03.jpg)
- Nomination Purple Martin (Progne subis) in shelter, Rondeau Provincial Park, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 12:49, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 13:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Mary Church, Blenheim, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 12:49, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 13:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Mary's Church, Maidstone, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 12:49, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 13:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Paul's Anglican Church, Erieau, Ontario, 2025-07-06; detail of corner stone --Crisco 1492 12:49, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination St. Paul's Anglican Church, Erieau, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 12:49, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 13:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coat of arms, Façade of O Obradoiro, CathedraL of Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 11:51, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:09, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coat of arms, Façade of O Obradoiro, CathedraL of Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 11:51, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:12, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Coat of arms, College of Saint Jerome, Travesa de Fonseca street, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia (Spain). --Lmbuga 11:51, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 11:52, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Turgenev Street (Yefremov) during rare snowless winter --Юрий Д.К. 11:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 12:41, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gsar Mednine In Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 11:09, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:03, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lucignano - St. Joseph Steps. -- Anna.Massini 08:41, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Anna.Massini
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 12:41, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Lucignano - Flowered corner. -- Anna.Massini 08:41, 28 October 2025 (UTC)Anna.Massini
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 12:41, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Airbus_A310_AirZeroG%2C_ILA_2024%2C_Schoenefeld_(ILA43908).jpg)
- Nomination Tail of the Airbus A310 Zero-G at ILA Berlin Air Show 2024 --MB-one 08:39, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:57, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-BAS_24%2C_Brussels_(P1170521-RR).jpg)
- Nomination Chevrolet Corvette convertible at Brussels Auto Show 2024 --MB-one 08:39, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 12:41, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Koenigsegg%2C_Auto_2024%2C_Zurich_(PANA0940).jpg)
- Nomination Koenigsegg Jesko Absolut at Auto Zürich 2024 --MB-one 08:39, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 12:41, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Nissan_Stagea_RS_FOUR_S%2C_Gdansk_(LRM_20201004_111450).jpg)
- Nomination: Nissan Stagea RS FOUR S --MB-one 08:39, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Mega_e-Scouty%2C_BAS_24%2C_Brussels_(P1170405-RR).jpg)
-
-
-
-20251017-RM-170619.jpg/120px-Nebelgrauer_Trichterling_(Clitocybe_nebularis%2C_syn._Lepista_nebularis)-20251017-RM-170619.jpg)
-
-
- Nomination Hand pump at the Liasgrube environmental station in Unterstürmig --Ermell 08:36, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:10, 28 October 2025 (UTC) Support Perfect :) --LexKurochkin 12:11, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_3_(6).jpg)
- Nomination 3 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 12:07, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_3_(7).jpg)
- Nomination 3 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_3_(8).jpg)
- Nomination 3 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 3 --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_5_(1).jpg)
- Nomination 5 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 1 --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_ul._Bohaterów_Getta_5_(2).jpg)
- Nomination 5 Bohaterów Getta Street in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 08:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 11:50, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
.jpg/120px-Fresque_en_Lego_(Colmar).jpg)
-
.jpg/120px-Hydravion_en_Lego_(Colmar).jpg)
-
%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_28.jpg/120px-León_(Panthera_leo)%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_28.jpg)
- Nomination Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tagooty 07:44, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_37.jpg/120px-León_(Panthera_leo)%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_37.jpg)
- Nomination Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 11:47, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Purple
chromatic aberration to fix. --Gower 19:37, 28 October 2025 (UTC) Done --Poco a poco 20:03, 28 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:38, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_44.jpg/120px-León_(Panthera_leo)%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_44.jpg)
- Nomination Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Polinova 14:43, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-27%2C_DD_03.jpg/120px-León_(Panthera_leo)%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-27%2C_DD_03.jpg)
- Nomination Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 08:15, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Lyon_1er_-_Palais_Saint-Pierre_-_Escalier_Puvis_de_Chavannes_-_Tableau_Le_Bois_sacré_cher_aux_arts_et_aux_muses_(Pierre_Puvis_de_Chavannes).jpg)
- Nomination Allegorical painting of the arts and the muses --Romainbehar 07:29, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 11:47, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
.jpg/120px-Бухара%2C_медресе_Иброхим-Охунд_(1).jpg)
-
-
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - View from the Cheeses Tower - Southeast of town --Benjism89 06:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:03, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - View from the Cheeses Tower - Tower of the church of Our Lady --Benjism89 06:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:03, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - View from the Cheeses Tower - Filaterie street and Saint Marcel church --Benjism89 06:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:03, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Galkin house, Karl Marx street 37, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:47, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:51, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Manasein house, Karl Marx street 45, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:47, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Very nice, but could you reduce artifacts around edges (cables, trees)? --Gower 17:07, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: House, Karl Marx street 47, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:47, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Strange "ghost" artifacts around the roof, especially at left. --Sebring12Hrs 20:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Sapozhnikov house, Karl Marx street 53, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:47, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sandetsky palace park, Karl Marx street 64, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:47, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
White artifact in the trees and artifacts around the roof. --Sebring12Hrs 20:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portrait of a juvenile Egyptian goose (Alopochen aegyptiaca). --Alexis Lours 06:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tagooty 07:12, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A black-headed gull (Chroicocephalus ridibundus) in flight. --Alexis Lours 06:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality as for flying bird. --Gower 07:21, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A carrion crow (Corvus corone). --Alexis Lours 06:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:52, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Portrait of an Eurasian coot (Fulica atra). --Alexis Lours 06:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:14, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination A grey heron (Ardea cinerea). --Alexis Lours 06:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:51, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Bieżanów Cemetery, Mała Góra street, Bieżanów, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Bieżanów Cemetery, Mała Góra street, Bieżanów, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Kościelniki Volunteer Fire Department, 7H Pysocice street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:40, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Bieżanowska street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Energetyk Family Allotment Garden, 20 Niebieska street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Arenaria interpres (Ruddy Turnstone) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:40, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arenaria interpres (Ruddy Turnstone) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:40, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arenaria interpres (Ruddy Turnstone) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:40, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Arenaria interpres (Ruddy Turnstone) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Red-wattled Lapwing (Vanellus indicus) in Bakkhali, West Bengal, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vragender-NL, windmill: korenmolen de Vier Winden--Michielverbeek 06:11, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:14, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vragender-NL, church: the Sint-Antonius van Paduakerk --Michielverbeek 06:11, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Llez 06:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance sign at Sidi Rabat, Souss-Massa National Park, Morocco --Tagooty 06:10, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 12:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Entrance at Sidi Rabat, Souss-Massa National Park, Morocco --Tagooty 06:10, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 12:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Residential building near the beach in Sidi R'bat, Souss-Massa, Morocco --Tagooty 06:10, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 12:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cantonal Police of the Canton of Basel-Stadt. By --Ahmet Düz 05:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC) Oppose Weak sharpness and a lot of chromatic aberration --Jakubhal 06:29, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline {{{2}}}
- Nomination Cantonal Police of the Canton of Basel-Stadt. By --Ahmet Düz 05:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Traditional costume groups from Baden, Baselbiet and Alsace in "Basel Tattoo Parade 2025". By --Ahmet Düz 05:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC) Oppose Focus is on the audience on the left, and the marching people are not sharp enough. The image is also tilted. --Jakubhal 06:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline {{{2}}}
- Nomination Traditional costume groups from Baden, Baselbiet and Alsace in "Basel Tattoo Parade 2025". By --Ahmet Düz 05:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Naarebainl" in in "Basel Tattoo Parade 2025". By --Ahmet Düz 05:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC) Oppose Not sharp enough and A LOT of chromatic aberration --Jakubhal 06:26, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline {{{2}}}
- Nomination "Naarebainl" in in "Basel Tattoo Parade 2025". By --Ahmet Düz 05:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Shell of a Door Snail, Macrogastra rolphii --Llez 05:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Jurassic Park, designed by Pit Ruge, pumpkin festival in the garden of Ludwigsburg Palace, Germany --Llez 05:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_02.jpg/120px-Andiast-Breil-Brigels._24-09-2025._(d.j.b.)_02.jpg)
- Nomination Trail from Andiast to Breil-Brigels. Bad weather in the Breil-Brigels region, with rain expected.
--Famberhorst 05:26, 28 October 2025 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 05:44, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Trail from Andiast to Breil-Brigels. Bad weather in the Breil-Brigels region, with rain expected.
-
- Nomination Southwest portal of St Lamberti Church reflected in a shop window under the arcades on Prinzipalmarkt, Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:23, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Maintenance and machine hall in the ammunition depot, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:23, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:29, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Bunker 15 in the ammunition depot, Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:23, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Top and bottom overexposed (whites burned out) --Gower 17:07, 28 October 2025 (UTC) Done The photo was taken against the light, and the bright areas between the trees are rather insignificant. They are also sufficiently sharp. Nevertheless, I made a few minor adjustments. --XRay 06:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sunflower in a phacelia field in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:23, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_24.jpg/120px-Waltensburg-Vuorz._Panoramaweg._20-09-2025._(actm.)_24.jpg)
- Nomination Waltensburg/Vuorz Storage sheds on the flanks of the panoramic road between Waltensburg/Vuorz - Breil/Brigels.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --XRay 05:24, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Waltensburg/Vuorz Storage sheds on the flanks of the panoramic road between Waltensburg/Vuorz - Breil/Brigels.
-
.jpg/120px-Hazenpootje._Locatie%2C_Paddenstoelenreservaat._14-10-2025._(actm.).jpg)
- Nomination Coprinopsis lagopus
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Coprinopsis lagopus
-
- Nomination Red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Bednarski Park in Kraków --Jakubhal 04:13, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wooden Greek Catholic Church of Saint James in Powroźnik --Jakubhal 04:13, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:18, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Wooden Greek Catholic Church of Saint James in Powroźnik --Jakubhal 04:13, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination View from Góra Parkowa in Krynica-Zdrój --Jakubhal 04:13, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Toʻra murodtoʻra minorasi (the description in English is not a requirement, Gower). By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 00:12, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review Comment dust spot. --Rjcastillo 00:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
To clarify: two dust spots above the terrace to the left of the tower. Easy to fix. --Екатерина Борисова 00:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Kalyan minaret. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 00:12, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review Comment There is posterization in the sky --Jakubhal 04:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
_trunk,_Estufa_Fria,_Lisbon,_Portugal_julesvernex2.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_in_shelter,_Rondeau_Provincial_Park,_Ontario,_2025-07-06_03.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
-20251017-RM-170619.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-26,_DD_28.jpg)
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-26,_DD_37.jpg)
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-26,_DD_44.jpg)
,_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_03.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_02.jpg)
_24.jpg)
.jpg)
October 27, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination Relief of Kronstadt Naval Cathedral, Kronstadt, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:50, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Not sharp enough, sorry. --Gower 17:14, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Petunia in Ekaterininsky park, Kronstadt, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:50, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Petunia in Ekaterininsky park, Kronstadt, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:50, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination A mine train at the Ensemble Rischbach-Anlage --FlocciNivis 17:20, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 12:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: The house at the Prälat-Goebel-Straße 14 in St. Ingbert --FlocciNivis 17:20, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
White area artifact at the bottom right. --Sebring12Hrs 00:15, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Done --FlocciNivis 19:08, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Ksar El KrikriyaCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-71.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 17:19, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
It needs better categorization. --Lvova 00:09, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Ksar El KrikriyaCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-71.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 17:19, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
It needs better categorization. --Lvova 00:09, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Hipolitów house, 3 Mariacki square, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 16:48, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
%2C_Old_Town%2C_Kraków%2C_Poland.jpg/120px-Tenement%2C_7_Maly_Rynek_(Little_Market_square)%2C_Old_Town%2C_Kraków%2C_Poland.jpg)
- Nomination: Tenement, 7 Maly Rynek (Little Market square), Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 16:48, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Almost good, but why wall isnt't captured parallel to camera sensor? It would be better. --Gower 17:17, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
@Gower: Next time I’ll do it that way, sorry. --Igor123121 17:46, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_DSC_2887.jpg/120px-2026_Volvo_XC60_(SPA)_DSC_2887.jpg)
- Nomination Volvo XC60 (SPA) in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 16:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 12:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Citroën Berlingo III in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 16:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 12:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Armstrong Siddeley Star Sapphire Saloon at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 16:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose The back side is strange (maybe it's possible to say blurry). --Lvova 09:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Cupra Leon Mk4 in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 16:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Blacks clipped. --Gower 17:14, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Gasr MednineCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-39.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 16:16, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Compo is fine, could be sharper. --PetarM 16:50, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Wagon markings on a covered goods wagon (baggage car G10) belonging to the Deutsche Reichsbahn of the Cuckoo Railway
--F. Riedelio 15:58, 27 October 2025 (UTC) - Review
Nice, but chromatic aberration at the bottom and color noise to fix. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC) New version Improved. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 08:21, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Something very bad happened with edges of the stones like overprocessing unfortunately. --Gower 20:54, 28 October 2025 (UTC) New version Denoised. Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 08:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination: Wagon markings on a covered goods wagon (baggage car G10) belonging to the Deutsche Reichsbahn of the Cuckoo Railway
-
- Nomination Märklin model of a covered goods wagon (Gmhs 54) of the Deutsche Bundesbahn
--F. Riedelio 15:58, 27 October 2025 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Märklin model of a covered goods wagon (Gmhs 54) of the Deutsche Bundesbahn
-
-
-
- Nomination Ksar Beni Khedache in Mednine in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 14:53, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
There is a huge dust spot left of that metal anchor, and another dark stripe (could be a bird) a bit more to the right. Otherwise very good. --Plozessor 04:15, 28 October 2025 (UTC) dear Plozessor I removed it have a look please --IssamBarhoumi 20:00, 28 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:18, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ksar Zemmour in Mednine in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 14:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 09:03, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Ksar Zemmour in Mednine in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 14:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Efremov - 2025 - Rowan in the City Garden --Юрий Д.К. 13:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Betula pendula in Yefremov --Юрий Д.К. 13:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: 1973 Ferrari 365 GT4 BB --TTTNIS 13:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Rear view of 1973 Ferrari 365 GT4 BB --TTTNIS 13:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-Бухара%2C_Кукельдаш%2C_крыша_(1).jpg)
- Nomination: Roof of Kukeldash madrasa. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 12:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review Comment Visible noise and multiple dust spots in the sky. Can you fix it? --LexKurochkin 12:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Бухара%2C_Кукельдаш%2C_крыша_(2).jpg)
- Nomination: Roof of Kukeldash madrasa. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 12:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review Comment Visible noise and multiple dust spots in the sky. Can you fix it? --LexKurochkin 12:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Бухара%2C_Кукельдаш%2C_крыша_(3).jpg)
- Nomination: Roof of Kukeldash madrasa. Bukhara, Uzbekistan. --Красный 12:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review Comment The sky is rather noisy with visible dust spots, can you fix it? -- LexKurochkin 12:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Sons of England World War I Memorial, Tecumseh Park, Chatham, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 11:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:41, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Cosmo_Apartments%2C_Barcelona_(P1170724).jpg)
- Nomination: Cosmo Apartments at Plaça de Joan Peiró, Barcelona --MB-one 10:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 17:20, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Islam_Hoja_Minaret%2C_Khiva_(Islomxoʻja_minorasi%2C_Минарет_Ислам_Ходжа%2C_Хива).jpg)
-
- Nomination A Canada goose (Branta canadensis) in flight. --Alexis Lours 09:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 06:09, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination: File:Kukeldash Madrasah in Tashkent.-- 26D 07:32, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review It needs a perspective correction --Michielverbeek 07:50, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Norderney%2C_Promenade%2C_Wegbeleuchtung_--_2025_--_9015_(bw).jpg)
- Nomination: Street lights on the promenade, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 06:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Nice, but too hight contrast to me. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC) Comment Unfortunately, you haven't made a decision for or against it. Black-and-white photos are characterized by higher contrast. That's a conscious decision on my part. --XRay 07:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
I did it consciously. I can put only comment. Contrast can be changed. --Gower 19:37, 28 October 2025 (UTC) Done I completely redeveloped the photo—with less contrast. --XRay 06:42, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination: Laren Gld-NL, the reformed church --Michielverbeek 06:07, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Tympanum slightly burned. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Galkin house, Karl Marx street 37, Kazan --Mike1979 Russia 06:04, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Left side looks unnatural due to perspwctive correction (upper left corner is too pointed and upturned). Can you fix it, please? --Екатерина Борисова 01:04, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
%2C_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-25%2C_DD_60.jpg/120px-Leopardo_(Panthera_pardus)%2C_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-25%2C_DD_60.jpg)
- Nomination Leopard (Panthera pardus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 05:59, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Gower 19:37, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
%2C_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-25%2C_DD_86.jpg/120px-Mangosta_rayada_(Mungos_mungo)%2C_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-25%2C_DD_86.jpg)
- Nomination Banded mongoose (Mungos mungo), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 05:59, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
There's some strange dusty/blurry area between his eyes and nose. --Екатерина Борисова 01:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. I see the white spot on his lip mentioned, but it looks like there is just something on his lip. --Polinova 14:47, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination: E-cars from “Emil Frey Classics AG” in Basel. By --Ahmet Düz 05:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC) Comment chromatic aberration on the car and people --Jakubhal 05:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
- Nomination: E-cars from “Emil Frey Classics AG” in Basel. By --Ahmet Düz 05:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_pl._Chopina_1_(03).jpg)
- Nomination 1 Chopina Square in Kłodzko 2 --Jacek Halicki 01:30, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:54, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
,_Old_Town,_Kraków,_Poland.jpg)
_DSC_2887.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire,_Tanzania,_2024-05-25,_DD_60.jpg)
,_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire,_Tanzania,_2024-05-25,_DD_86.jpg)
.jpg)
October 26, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination Manhole cover after rain in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality, acceptable. --Gower 16:22, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Manhole cover in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Lacking detail, probably because of quality of phone camera. --Gower 19:37, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Hardware Tools Supporting Wikimedia Projects logo --Suyash.dwivedi 22:00, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
_02.jpg/120px-Shikh_Mosque_(front_side)_02.jpg)
- Nomination: Shikh MosqueThis is a photo of the protected monument identified by the ID 82-75 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Bill.pix 21:29, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Perspective should be corrected, and the right part of the sky is blown out, and it's a bit noisy/grainy (especially the sky). This is probably fixable with better raw conversion. --Plozessor 05:09, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination El Khouch MosqueThis is a photo of the protected monument identified by the ID 82-87 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Bill.pix 21:28, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose I fixed the categorisation, but it is blurry, sorry. --Lvova 16:18, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_3.jpg/120px-Wörlitz%2C_St-Petrikirche_(September_2023)_3.jpg)
-
- Nomination Mosquée FadhlounCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-45.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 18:19, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose I'm sorry, but the shot is blurry. --Lvova 16:18, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mosquée el JedidCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-85.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 18:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Not very sharp, large number of dust spots, perspective, ghost person walking. --Plozessor 05:07, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mosquée EttourkCette photo décrit un monument historique protégé en Tunisie et identifié par l'ID 82-51.Moi, en tant que détenteur des droits d’auteur sur cette œuvre, je la publie sous la licence suivante :Cette image a été versée dans le cadre de Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Cheima fezzani 18:12, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
As the subject is the minaret, the description and Category need to be more specific. Cropping the lower wall in front will help focus on the subject. Exposure of the minaret could be raised. --Tagooty 05:52, 30 October 2025 (UTC) Oppose Blurred, chroma noise, perspective... --Sebring12Hrs 21:38, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: City Hall of the former City of Kazimierz, 1 Wolnica square, Kazimierz, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 18:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Too tight crop at the bottom for me. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Not very sharp and artifacts at the right top corner. --Lvova 16:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: City Hall of the former City of Kazimierz, 1 Wolnica square, Kazimierz, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 18:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: City Hall of the former City of Kazimierz, 1 Wolnica square, Kazimierz, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 18:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
_Synagogue%2C_1860_design%2C_Ignacy_Hercok%2C_24_Miodowa_Street%2C_Kazimierz%2C_Kraków%2C_Poland.jpg/120px-Tempel_(Progressive)_Synagogue%2C_1860_design%2C_Ignacy_Hercok%2C_24_Miodowa_Street%2C_Kazimierz%2C_Kraków%2C_Poland.jpg)
- Nomination: Tempel (Progressive) Synagogue, 1860 design, Ignacy Hercok, 24 Miodowa street, Kazimierz, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 18:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kapliczka_przydrożna_w_Potworowie_(1).jpg)
- Nomination Roadside shrine in Potworów 1 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 14:25, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:40, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Nelio_Biedermann_auf_der_Frankfurter_Buchmesse_2025%2C_(P1220849).jpg)
- Nomination: Nelio Biedermann, Swiss writer at the Frankfurt Book Fair 2025. --Celestinesucess 12:15, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Maybe crop that thing at bottom? --Gower 13:37, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
And the thing at the left. --Lvova 16:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
@Gower and Lvova: Done Thank you for the feedback --Celestinesucess 10:47, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Frankfurter_Buchmesse_2025%2C_(P1220973).jpg)
- Nomination: Joan June, author of the novel Bestie --Celestinesucess 12:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Good, but blacks clipped and the other person from the right can be cropped. --Gower 12:09, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
@Gower: Done Thank you for the feedback. --Celestinesucess 22:31, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Blacks still clipped --Gower 11:02, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination: Abdullaxon madrasasi ceiling. By User:Panpanchik --Lvova 09:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
I recommend PC, it will be better with parallel vertical lines. --Gower 13:37, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
If you had bothered to look into the category, as I did, you would have realized that this is not a photo of a flat ceiling, but of an arch ceiling. --Екатерина Борисова 01:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Volkswagen Taos in Stuttgart --Alexander-93 08:29, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Gower 19:37, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination: Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:39, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_20.jpg/120px-León_(Panthera_leo)%2C_parque_nacional_Serengueti%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-26%2C_DD_20.jpg)
- Nomination Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:39, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Nominated twice by mistake Poco a poco 21:27, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Podurueva manor main building, Lobachevsky street 10, Kazan. --Mike1979 Russia 07:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
White aera artifact at the bottom left. --Sebring12Hrs 15:42, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
This is a barrier. If cut it off, half of the car will be left. What's the best variant? --Mike1979 Russia 06:24, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Ahhh you are right, I don't know, but I don't like this barrier. Other opinion ? --Sebring12Hrs 00:18, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sanctuary of La Verna - The Annunciation by Andrea Della Robbia. -- Anna.Massini 06:53, 26 October 2025 (UTC)Anna.Massini
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:36, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Sanctuary of La Verna ̈ Incarnation by Andrea della Robbia. -- Anna.Massini 06:53, 26 October 2025 (UTC)Anna.Massini
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:36, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Бухара%2C_улица_Ходжа_Порсо_(2).jpg)
-
.jpg/120px-Бухара%2C_улица_Ходжа_Порсо_(4).jpg)
-
_01.jpg/120px-Breil-Brigels._24-09-2025._(d.j.b.)_01.jpg)
- Nomination Trail from Andiast to Breil-Brigels. Bad weather in the Breil-Brigels region, with rain expected.
--Famberhorst 05:19, 26 October 2025 (UTC) - Promotion Support Good quality. --Gower 19:37, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Nomination Trail from Andiast to Breil-Brigels. Bad weather in the Breil-Brigels region, with rain expected.
-
- Nomination Gray brocket deer (Mazama gouazoubira) at the Curitiba Zoo. A medium-sized South American cervid species, identified by its reddish-brown coat, simple two-point antlers, and crepuscular activity. --Wilfredor 03:44, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:37, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Broad-snouted caiman (Caiman latirostris) at the Curitiba Zoo. South American alligatorid species distinguished by its wide snout, prominent osteoderms, and average length of 2 to 3 meters. It inhabits freshwater environments such as swamps and lagoons. --Wilfredor 03:44, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:38, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
_02.jpg)
_3.jpg)
_Synagogue,_1860_design,_Ignacy_Hercok,_24_Miodowa_Street,_Kazimierz,_Kraków,_Poland.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_01.jpg)
October 25, 2025
[edit]-
.jpg/120px-Cobalt%2C_Interboot_2023%2C_Friedrichshafen_(P1120596).jpg)
-
-
- Nomination: Crypt plate, parish church of St. Ägydius and Koloman, Steyr --Isiwal 20:26, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review Comment I see strong color noise, very visible on side panels and in shadows, is it fixable? --LexKurochkin 14:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination: Building overlooking the Atlantic Ocean, Sidi Rabat, Massa, Morocco --Tagooty 19:12, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Plants at bottom are almost black and white. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
@Gower: To me the plants are a dark green, which is natural as they are in deep shade. I do not see black and white. --Tagooty 14:10, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Palace of Art, façade, 1898 design. Franciszek Mączyński and Jacek Malczewski, 4 Szczepański Square, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 13:50, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Generally good, but too tight crop at bottom for me. --Gower 09:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: St. Francis of Assisi Church, 2 Franciszkańska street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 13:50, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Compression visible on the sky. --Gower 12:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Consulate of Croatia in Kotor / Montenegro --Imehling 09:15, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
It is leaning a bit. --Sebring12Hrs 10:47, 25 October 2025 (UTC) Done --Imehling 19:15, 26 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:22, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Halle-Neustadt_(Oktober_2025).jpg)
-
_2.jpg/120px-Gedenkstein_Maikundgebung_(Oktober_2025)_2.jpg)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination: Carl Volkmann pipe organ console, Elizabeth church in Chorzów. --Gower 06:47, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 13:48, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
The colours look unnatural to me. Shouldn't thet music book be white? --JoachimKohler-HB 18:40, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Colours are unnatural indeed, because that church has unusual old-type lighting unfortunately... It is visible also on other pictures. Paper is creamy in that case. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_2.jpg)
October 24, 2025
[edit]-
_2.jpg/120px-Burg_Regenstein_(Oktober_2024)_2.jpg)
-
_17%2C_Lutherbuche.jpg/120px-Stolberg_(September_2025)_17%2C_Lutherbuche.jpg)
- Nomination: Lutherbuche near Stolberg in the Harz Mountains, stamp point 216 of the Harzer Wandernadel (HWN) --Romzig 21:12, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Thick-walled maze polypore (Fomitopsis quercina) on a stub -- George Chernilevsky 19:06, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:33, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Neubau_der_Pfaffendorfer_Brücke_(23.10.2025).jpg)
- Nomination: New construction of the Pfaffendorf Bridge in Koblenz -- Rolf Kranz 18:18, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Many grid-like artifacts in different parts of picture (sky, water), partially unsharp. --Gower 21:13, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Fritscha tenement, 1 Little Market Square, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 18:07, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Rondeau West Front Range Lighthouse, Erieau, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 16:56, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Not sharp. --Екатерина Борисова 00:40, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
The subject (lighthouse) is sharp enough that you can read the sign. The pedestrians are not the subject. --Crisco 1492 11:41, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
I meant. that the lighthouse and the sign on it are also not sharp (though not so blurry as the pedestrians). Let's wait for other opinions. --Екатерина Борисова 01:35, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Southern side of St. Tryphon Square in Kotor / Montenegro --Imehling 12:02, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
It looks underexposed. --Sebring12Hrs 12:43, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Just an early morning picture. I've uploaded a new version. Maybe better now. --Imehling 19:52, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Light is good now, but there are strong purple CAs at left and right. --Sebring12Hrs 02:31, 25 October 2025 (UTC) Done --Imehling 09:12, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
.jpg/120px-Škoda_Elroq_Classic-Gala_2025_DSC_0783_(cropped).jpg)
- Nomination Škoda Elroq at Classic-Gala 2025 --Alexander-93 11:29, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 20:42, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-EBACE_2023%2C_Le_Grand-Saconnex_(EB237637).jpg)
- Nomination Cabin details of a Gulfstream G550 executive jet at EBACE 2023, Le Grand-Saconnex, Canton of Geneva --MB-one 10:44, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Unsharp, sorry. --Екатерина Борисова 00:43, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Amazone_UF_1302%2C_Agritechnica_2023%2C_Hanover_(P1160349).jpg)
-
.jpg/120px-Ribnitzer_Stadtforst%2C_Dierhagen_(_1100892).jpg)
- Nomination: Ribnitzer Stadtforst in Dierhagen, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern --MB-one 10:44, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Underexposed. --Екатерина Борисова 01:07, 27 October 2025 (UTC) Done Thanks for the review --MB-one 21:38, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Sea foam washed up on the beach, Norderney, Lower Saxony, Germany --XRay 04:23, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Gower 21:13, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
I like that image, the composition and the play with bokeh are good (if needed: Support). In fact, I'd prefer this image over a similar candidate from 2 weeks ago, the artistical (for lack of a better word) quality is higher. That said, I am a bit puzzled. I certainly see a sharp area, where the foam bubbles lie the most in a shadow (follow the white track from bottom right until you reach the first dark area). But this area of scharpness does not extend linearly, it rather looks like a more or less rounded sharpness area. It's an interesting phenomenon, I think that's attributable to pecularities of the used telephoto lens. --Grand-Duc 21:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
So it is a contra and we need a discussion or is it a comment and back to pro? --XRay 07:59, 28 October 2025 (UTC) Comment Perhaps as additional information: The photo was taken with a slight telephoto lens. The focus plane is actually even. However, what creates a slightly rounded effect are the iridescent colors caused by the low sun. This creates a rather rounded play of colors. I hope it's OK if I reset to “support.” There are two pro votes. --XRay 06:47, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Île de Gorée vue de la chaloupe --Fawaz.tairou 00:14, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Island is too dark. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
_2.jpg)
_17,_Lutherbuche.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
October 23, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: Trophée Wikimédiens de l'année 2025 - Wikimania 2025 à Nairobi. --Fawaz.tairou 23:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
The background is distracting for this composition. I suggest trying a tighter crop on the subject. --E bailey 16:27, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Wikimania 2025 - Chambre au Trademark Hotel --Fawaz.tairou 23:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
The subject is a hotel room in Nairobi. Why is it important to describe this as Wikimania 2025? I don't see any part of the subject relevant to the event. --E bailey 16:30, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
It was a venue, so why not? --Lvova 16:02, 28 October 2025 (UTC)I'm asking about the description and categorization of the image. It seems to be lacking information that would enable a commons user to understand the context for how the image relates to the event. Write a more thorough description. --E bailey 20:54, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Wikimania 2025 - Chambre au Trademark Hotel --Fawaz.tairou 23:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 11:06, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination: Öjeby kyrka --Brackenheim 19:42, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Please, apply a vertical perspective correction, there is also CA in the tree --Poco a poco 20:29, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Chwalibogowski tenement house, 13 św. Jana street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 19:00, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Horizontal alignment is needed. --Екатерина Борисова 23:41, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_Theater%2C_5_Jagiellonska_Street%2C_Old_Town%2C_Krakow%2C_Poland.jpg/120px-Stary_(Old)_Theater%2C_5_Jagiellonska_Street%2C_Old_Town%2C_Krakow%2C_Poland.jpg)
- Nomination Stary (Old) Theater, 5 Jagiellonska street, Old Town, Krakow, Poland --Igor123121 19:00, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Sorry, IMO low sharpness. The bottom is disturbing too. --XRay 15:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Building of the Polish Academy of Learning, 1857 design. Filip Pokutyński, 17 Sławkowska Street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 19:00, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Unsharp at the top. And why not a closer aperture? f/8 would help. --XRay 15:02, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tenement house, 30 św. Wawrzyńca street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 19:00, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Tenement house, 13 Krakowska street, Wesoła, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 19:00, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Windows cat missing --Poco a poco 20:30, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Horizontal alignment is needed. --Екатерина Борисова 23:44, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Tosh_Gate%2C_Khiva_(Toshdarvoza%2C_Таш-дарваза_-_южные_ворота%2C_Хива).jpg)
- Nomination: Tosh Gate ("South Gate"), Khiva --PetarM 17:17, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Is it possible to denoise the sky? --Lvova 19:24, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
@Lvova It was alredy done. I dont see noise as problem here and it's still in full size (50 Mpx). --PetarM 08:38, 24 October 2025 (UTC) @LvovaNow you have double denoise. Enjoy. --PetarM 09:22, 24 October 2025 (UTC) Comment Can anyone check this photo, since i see no "mistakes". --PetarM 15:46, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Franciszek Kachel Park in Bytom, Południowy pond. --Gower 16:33, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Both sides are blurry. --Екатерина Борисова 01:38, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Incinerator building in Bytom. --Gower 16:33, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 12:43, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Mosque Sellaouti in Djerba in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 13:56, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Huge dust spot on sky to remove. --Gower 16:42, 23 October 2025 (UTC) dear Gower I removed it --IssamBarhoumi 20:37, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
thanks, but 2 another also to remove (I marked them by imagenote) --Gower 20:46, 24 October 2025 (UTC) dear Gower I removed them have a look please --IssamBarhoumi 21:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Mosque Sellaouti in Djerba in Tunisia --IssamBarhoumi 13:56, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. --Gower 19:37, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-BMW_M4_CSL%2C_EMS_2024%2C_Essen_(P1032288).jpg)
-
.jpg/120px-Mercury%2C_TC_24%2C_Essen_(TCE43432).jpg)
-
.jpg/120px-2025_Kłodzko%2C_kościół_Niepokalanego_Poczęcia_NMP_(06).jpg)
- Nomination: Church of the Immaculate Conception in Kłodzko 5 by User:Jacek Halicki--Boston9 12:28, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Can't find anything in focus here. --Екатерина Борисова 23:49, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Background is in focus ;) --Gower 07:07, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Strix ocellata (Mottled Wood-Owl) in Bhigwan, Maharashtra, India. --Tisha Mukherjee 12:24, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
It's a bit noisy, which is disturbing esp. in the out of focus leaves --MB-one 08:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: File:Extérieur Mosquée el Kbob avec puit au premier plan --Atef Ouni 10:19, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
The foreground with this piece of something is very blurry. --Екатерина Борисова 23:52, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
-
%2C_Lighthouse_Conservation_Area%2C_Tilbury%2C_Ontario%2C_2025-07-06_03.jpg/120px-Lighthouse_(1818)%2C_Lighthouse_Conservation_Area%2C_Tilbury%2C_Ontario%2C_2025-07-06_03.jpg)
- Nomination: Lighthouse (1818), Lighthouse Conservation Area, Tilbury, Ontario, 2025-07-06 --Crisco 1492 10:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Seems underexposed, otherwise good --Benjism89 16:25, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
The peak of the lighthouse was in shadow at the time. This is consistent with items such as File:Lighthouse (1818), Lighthouse Conservation Area, Tilbury, Ontario, 2025-07-06 02.jpg, taken the same day (with slightly different lighting). --Crisco 1492 11:39, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Previously unassessed. --Lvova 09:45, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
I would crop a little from top an bottom and make the description a bit more specific that "Animals of Thessaloniki". But I like it. --MB-one 08:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Oops, you're right. Done. --Lvova 15:54, 28 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:29, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: The pedestrian tunnel underneath the Oskar-von-Miller-Ring as Munich Art Tunnel with Graffiti --FlocciNivis 05:51, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Unaesthetic flash(?) shadow in centre. --Gower 16:42, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
I did a different crop now restricting the image to the graffiti --FlocciNivis 17:55, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
_Theater,_5_Jagiellonska_Street,_Old_Town,_Krakow,_Poland.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
,_Lighthouse_Conservation_Area,_Tilbury,_Ontario,_2025-07-06_03.jpg)
October 22, 2025
[edit]-
.jpg/120px-Выборг%2C_бульвар_Кутузова%2C_47_(4).jpg)
- Nomination: Fire station in Vyborg, Russia. By User:ElenaLitera --Екатерина Борисова 23:50, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Good, but not very sharp. --Gower 09:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Tomb effigy of Nicholas of Salm-Salm --ReneeWrites 23:35, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Not sharp enough. --Екатерина Борисова 01:40, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Small coastal containership, PICTOR J, moored at Reykjavik Harbor, Iceland --GRDN711 23:23, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Nice image, but focus is sharp on the stern of the ship and blurry towards the bow (left side of image). --E bailey 16:42, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for the review. --GRDN711 23:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Dock on the Thames River, Chatham, Ontario, 2025-07-05 --Crisco 1492 18:15, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
There is a good sense of being a fine summer day down beside the Thames River but the dead black branch on the right detracts from the composition. Moving a foot to the left would have removed it from the image. --GRDN711 23:44, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tenement house, 11 Stolarska street, Kraków, Poland.jpg --Igor123121 17:35, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Not a good composition, sorry. --Plozessor 05:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_tenement_house%2C_1889_design._Teodor_Talowski%2C_35_Karmelicka_Street%2C_Kraków%2C_Poland.jpg/120px-Pod_Pająkiem_(Under_the_Spider)_tenement_house%2C_1889_design._Teodor_Talowski%2C_35_Karmelicka_Street%2C_Kraków%2C_Poland.jpg)
- Nomination Pod Pająkiem (Under the Spider) tenement house, 1889 design. Teodor Talowski, 35 Karmelicka street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 17:35, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Unfavorable cropping (disturbing traffic signs), fixable? --F. Riedelio 15:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 06:38, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Mufti of Tunisia with Imams of Mosque Zitouna and other mosques celebrating the 27th night of Ramadan a great celebration in Islam this celebration is held in front of Mosque Zitouna Mihrab. --IssamBarhoumi 14:03, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Quite noisy and probably not at full resolution. Should be fixable though --MB-one 08:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
dear MB-one I reduced the noisehve a look please --IssamBarhoumi 21:09, 28 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:29, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Classic-Gala_2025%2C_Schwetzingen_(20250906-P1049170).jpg)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Unidentified mushroom, possibly a troublesome knight mushroom in the Bruderwald forest in Bamberg. Focus stack of 15 images. --Ermell 06:49, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. But also slightly too yellowish. --Syntaxys 07:09, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
Image is very good. Not grey but I wonder if this mushroom might be a Tricholoma scalpturatum (Yellowing Knight)? --GRDN711 00:09, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
@Ermell: fungi defined now as Pluteus cervinus. Update info, please --George Chernilevsky 15:28, 27 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 22:58, 27 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. --GRDN711 23:26, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
.jpg)
_tenement_house,_1889_design._Teodor_Talowski,_35_Karmelicka_Street,_Kraków,_Poland.jpg)
.jpg)
October 21, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination Tenement house, 23 Saint Marka street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland.jpg --Igor123121 19:55, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Oppose Too blurry, sorry. --Gower 19:37, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Tenement house, 30 Saint Wawrzyńca street, Kazimierz, Kraków, Poland.jpg --Igor123121 19:55, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion Support Good quality. A few more specific categories before nomination would have been good --MB-one 08:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Vue panoramique incluant Kasr Zemmour et les environs en fin de journée --Atef Ouni 11:06, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline Beautiful scene. But the alignment seems wavy. The crop is tight and awkward, especially in the top left corner. A flare is distracting. The categories are sparse. --Milseburg 13:49, 21 October 2025 (UTC) Oppose No response within a week. --Milseburg 15:39, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
-
.jpg/120px-Mini%2C_Berlin_(IMG_20190411_092956).jpg)
-
%2C_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-24%2C_DD_58.jpg/120px-Guepardos_(Acinonyx_jubatus)%2C_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-24%2C_DD_58.jpg)
- Nomination: Cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus), Tarangire National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 06:36, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Not sharp. For another person I would decide that it's unfixable, but let's see. --Lvova 15:15, 22 October 2025 (UTC) New version :) --Poco a poco 19:58, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: University of Adelaide main campus on 16 October 2025. By --Pangalau 04:51, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review It needs a perspective correction, the verticals are not straight --Michielverbeek 05:20, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Probably too high denoising, PC needed. --Gower 10:10, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Posters of the Christoph Merian Foundation in Basel (Switzerland), with a parked bicycle. By --Ahmet Düz 04:43, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review Comment Since the subject of the picture are the posters, it should be considered a derivative work, shouldn't it? --Harlock81 12:49, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
.jpg)
,_parque_nacional_de_Tarangire,_Tanzania,_2024-05-24,_DD_58.jpg)
October 20, 2025
[edit]-
.jpg/120px-2025%2C_Kraków%2C_Cmentarz_Rakowicki_(392).jpg)
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 06:35, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Purple chromatic aberration to fix around the white rocks. Otherwise acceptable. --Gower 10:10, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
.jpg)
October 19, 2025
[edit]-
_1.jpg/120px-Halle-Neustadt%2C_Am_Stadion_(Oktober_2025)_1.jpg)
- Nomination: House complex Am Stadion (former educational center and now seat of parts of the city administration) with mosaics by Josep Renau --Romzig 08:55, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Right side leaning out, left side slightly leaning in --Poco a poco 11:37, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for the review. Both lines are straight. It just appears slightly tilted due to the perspective correction. --Romzig 13:44, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
I don't get it, if you move the image from top to bottom you see that the gap to the border changes... --Poco a poco 20:09, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Szczepańska 11 --Igor123121 07:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Horizontal alignment is needed. --Екатерина Борисова 01:27, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
@Екатерина Борисова: Done --Igor123121 20:17, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
_1.jpg)
October 18, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: 2025, ul. Jagiellońska 10, Kraków --Igor123121 19:29, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
CA at the Windows, should probably just crop that off. --Plozessor 03:37, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
@Plozessor: Done --Igor123121 20:17, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Dome of Church of the Transfiguration at Spaso-Yevfimiyev Monastery, Suzdal --Vsatinet 17:27, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
Generally good, but, how about reduction of burned whites and little red halo over the edges? --Gower 06:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC) Done Let's try so. --Vsatinet 11:09, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
Still visible on the tower's left wall. --Lvova 12:30, 25 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good enough for you, godunov for me. Otherwise use some f/11 on zoom. --PetarM 10:32, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
October 17, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: 2025, Kraków, Rynek Główny 9 --Igor123121 17:36, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
PC is needed --Екатерина Борисова 00:07, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
PC fixed, but color noise and artifacts in dark areas to fix also. --Gower 18:00, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
It still needs PC (I mean horizontal alignment). --Екатерина Борисова 00:36, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
@Екатерина Борисова: Done --Igor123121 20:17, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
-
_y_flamencos_comunes_(Phoenicopterus_roseus)%2C_zona_de_conservación_de_Ngorongoro%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-27%2C_DD_20.jpg/120px-Flamencos_enanos_(Phoeniconaias_minor)_y_flamencos_comunes_(Phoenicopterus_roseus)%2C_zona_de_conservación_de_Ngorongoro%2C_Tanzania%2C_2024-05-27%2C_DD_20.jpg)
- Nomination: Lesser flamingos (Phoeniconaias minor) and greater flamingos (Phoenicopterus roseus), Ngorongoro Conservation Area, Tanzania --Poco a poco 17:25, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Not sharp --Екатерина Борисова 23:52, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
I applied more sharpness --Poco a poco 08:05, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
I'm still not ready to say that this image is sharp enough. --Екатерина Борисова 22:37, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
Please, I ask for another opinion, this is going nowhere --Poco a poco 21:12, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
Some birds were saved with processing, and some became sharp spots. --Lvova 12:27, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Not sure what you mean --Poco a poco 14:14, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
It seems tilted, otherwise ok. --Sebring12Hrs 02:19, 26 October 2025 (UTC) Tilted --Poco a poco 19:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
_y_flamencos_comunes_(Phoenicopterus_roseus),_zona_de_conservación_de_Ngorongoro,_Tanzania,_2024-05-27,_DD_20.jpg)
October 16, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination: Dohm in Germany-RP, catholic church: Filialkirche Sankt Remigius --Michielverbeek 05:16, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- Review
Near tower's cross there is a dust on sky to remove. Chceck perspective too, tower is slightly leaning, but maybe is isn't perfect in situ? --Gower 06:23, 16 October 2025 (UTC) Done Removed dust and small perspective improvement --Michielverbeek 07:03, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
A bit dark and PC not done, look at right, it's leaning. --Sebring12Hrs 02:16, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Thanks, I have Done a new perspective improvement and I made the church a bit brighter --Michielverbeek 22:19, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
October 14, 2025
[edit]-
- Nomination 1995 Nissan Primera 2.0Tm S Selection --TTTNIS 13:39, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
Looks like the denoising killed the detail. If you still have raw data available. Maybe it's fixable with better noise reduction. --MB-one 13:44, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
Not done in over a week.--Peulle 07:50, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
,_Lighthouse_Conservation_Area,_Tilbury,_Ontario,_2025-07-06_02.jpg){kind=link}
Consensual review
[edit]Rules
These rules are in accordance with the procedures normally followed in this section. If you don’t agree with them please feel free to propose changes.
- To ask for consensual review, just change the /Promotion, /Decline to /Discuss and add your comments immediately following the review. An automatic bot will move it to the consensual review section within one day. Alternatively move the image line from the main queue to Consensual Review/Images and follow the instructions in the edit window.
- You can move an image here if you contest the decision of the reviewer or have doubts about its eligibility (in which case an 'oppose' is assumed). In any case, please explain your reasons. Our QICBot will move it for you. When the bot moves it, you might have to revisit the nomination and expand your review into the Consensual Review format and add "votes".
- The decision is taken by majority of opinions, including the one of the first reviewer and excluding the nominator's. After a minimum period of 48 hours since the last entry, the decision will be registered at the end of the text using the template {{QICresult}} and then executed, according to the Guidelines.
- Using
{{support}}or{{oppose}}will make it easier to count your vote. - Votes by anonymous contributors aren't counted
- In case of draw, or if no additional opinions are given other than the first reviewer's, the nomination can be closed as inconclusive after 8 days, counted from its entry.
- Turn any existing comments into bullet points—add Oppose and Support if necessary.
- Add a comment explaining why you've moved the image here - be careful to stay inside the braces.
- Preview and save with a sensible edit summary like "+Image:Example.jpg".
File:Monument_to_the_Guardian_Angel_of_the_Lord,_Archcathedral_Basilica_of_the_Assumption_of_the_Blessed_Virgin_Mary_and_St._John_the_Baptist,_Przemyśl,_Poland.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Monument to the Guardian Angel of the Lord, Archcathedral Basilica of the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary and St. John the Baptist, Przemyśl, Poland --Igor123121 22:02, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Info Strong white CA's along the contour of the statue. Also horizontal alignment is needed. --Екатерина Борисова 22:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info It is not CA, as CA is never white due to its physical nature. I think it is digital processing artefact and, hense, it should be fixable (if it is not a camera-JPEG). --LexKurochkin 08:10, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 23:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree (per my comment above) --Екатерина Борисова 23:40, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Екатерина Борисова and the object appearing at the top edge could be cropped and removed as it only causes distortion. --Lmbuga 23:47, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above --LexKurochkin 08:10, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 08:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Cluny_-_Musée_d'art_et_d'archéologie_-_02.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Cluny (Saône-et-Loire, France) - Art and Archeology Museum, located inside the former Abbey palace - Part of the frieze of the abbey church narthex --Benjism89 07:17, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --Pdanese 11:26, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Too much chroma noise, sorry. I would like to hear other opinions. --Sebring12Hrs 23:26, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Sebring12Hrs and lack of detail. --Lmbuga 16:59, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 08:02, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Cipreskegels_van_een_Cupressus_sempervirens_'Stricta')._02-09-2025._(actm.)_02.jpg
[edit]._02-09-2025._(actm.)_02.jpg)
- Nomination Cypress cones of a Cupressus sempervirens 'Stricta'. Focus stack of 42 photos.
--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC) - Discussion
- Support Good quality. --Llez 05:41, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Temporary Oppose Sorry, but those cones do not belong to a tree of Cupressus sempervirens 'Stricta' (I'm sure of that Category:Cupressus sempervirens (cultivated, seed cones); Also, they are too small even though they are opening to release the seeds). According to a search on Google, it may be Chamaecyparis lawsoniana. --Harlock81 19:23, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Please, compare your pictures with File:Ajdovščina - lawsonova pacipresa (Chamaecyparis lawsoniana).jpg. --Harlock81 (talk) 19:45, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, greenish IMHO (white balance?). I don't think it's a white balance issue: Very unfortunate background. The greenish light is annoying.--Lmbuga 07:15, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 07:04, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Gabriel_with_his_cousin_at_Gulbenkian_Park,_Lisbon,_Portugal_(PPL1-Corrected)_julesvernex2.jpg
[edit]_julesvernex2.jpg)
- Nomination Gabriel with his cousin at Gulbenkian Park, Lisbon, Portugal (by Julesvernex2) --Sebring12Hrs 18:33, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose Bark or tree seems to be the main topic. Boys are totally blurred. --Gower 20:37, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info No, the boys are indeed the main subject. The idea here is to defy the conventional wisdom that the main subject should always be in focus. By blurring the boys I hide their identity while still letting the viewer see what they were doing (like in shadow puppetry) --Julesvernex2 22:10, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose I actually like that a lot. But I sadly don't think it meets the criteria for QI, --Polinova 14:45, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info Indeed, I see that the QI guidelines are quite clear: "Every important object on the picture should be sharp". One could argue the rule to be nearsighted, but that's a separate discussion :) --Julesvernex2 18:55, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good IMO. It is intentional. A guideline is a specific principle or line that is followed in the development, organisation, etc. of something; but it is not a mandatory law. It is not a mandatory protocol, it is a guideline. --Lmbuga 04:17, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Comment For everyone, but especially for @Polinova: The problem is knowing how to act if someone does not follow the guidelines. I would do the following: See if they give reasons for breaking them, consider the reasons, and, if I find them convincing, promote them. Nothing changes.--Lmbuga 06:12, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info About 15 years ago, I was asked at QIC to locate an image that I nominated. I did not do so (I didn't even mention the country), and it was promoted. The image was File:Obesidade.jpg. I should not have located it for obvious reasons (see the picture).--Lmbuga 06:21, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 07:11, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Kyriad_Hotel_Orly_Athis-Mons_Oct25_A7CR_07980.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Kyriad Hôtel Orly Aéroport - Athis Mons, wide view, Essonne, France --Tagooty 08:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 15:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs: Done --Tagooty 18:38, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info With the implicit oppose, moving to CR for review of the improved version. --Tagooty 06:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs:
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 07:01, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Kyriad_Hotel_Orly_Athis-Mons_Oct25_A7CR_07979.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Kyriad Hôtel Orly Aéroport - Athis Mons, Essonne, France --Tagooty 08:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose Underexposed ? --Sebring12Hrs 15:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 07:00, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
File:École_primaire_de_Villers-au-Tertre.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination École primaire de Villers-au-Tertre--JackyM59 07:02, 25 octobre 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Info Perspective correction is needed. Walls should be verticals. --Sebring12Hrs 10:44, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose As Sebring, too strong PC. --Gower 09:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Done Corrections done --JackyM59 10:49, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose PC not well done at left. In addition, the contrast is very high, the picture appears overprocessed. --Sebring12Hrs 23:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 06:58, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
File:1984_Nissan_Prairie_JW-G.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination 1984 Nissan Prairie JW-G --TTTNIS 11:31, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Info A bit too soft. --Lvova 15:05, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support I don't know whether Lvova meant to decline, but the image will be declined today if there is no response to the comment. I think this is fine, so I'm sending it to CR for discussion.--Peulle 07:52, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Peulle, it WOULD NOT be declined, it would be unassessed and could be nominated again. But because of your action - no, it is not QI imho, so now I'm oppose (and you supported just to discuss? oh). --Lvova 09:29, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak oppose Hmmmm... Borderline case to me. I see slight DoF problem - some 0,3-0,4m of the car near its backside is not really sharp. The second problem is too deep shadows below the car, so deep that wheels look melted in shadows. By the way, the photo shows remarkably low level of noise for given ISO and lighting conditions. --LexKurochkin 09:49, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 06:56, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Rouge-gorge_janvier.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Rouge-gorge dans le jardin en janvier --JackyM59 08:37, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose A little backlit with odd shadows making the lighting sub-optimal --Polinova 14:43, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Done Correction "Balance des blancs" done --JackyM59 15:45, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 07:18, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
File:León_(Panthera_leo),_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-26,_DD_20.jpg
[edit],_parque_nacional_Serengueti,_Tanzania,_2024-05-26,_DD_20.jpg)
- Nomination Lion (Panthera leo), Serengeti National Park, Tanzania --Poco a poco 07:31, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 11:50, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice, but Panthera leo is soft a bit and not very detailed. --Gower 19:37, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --LexKurochkin 07:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Oost-Gelre-Lichtenvoorde,_de_Sint-Bonifatiuskerk_GM1586-LT23_IMG_6601_2025-04-06_10.42.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Lichtenvoorde-NL, church: the Sint-Bonifatiuskerk --Michielverbeek 06:11, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --Llez 06:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose I see two problems here: verticals are slightly leaning CCW (fixable) and the upper part of the church is out of focus (unfixable). Sorry. --LexKurochkin 06:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --LexKurochkin 07:15, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Building_Sidi_Rabat_Morocco_Oct25_A7CR_08100.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination New residential building in Sidi R'bat, Souss-Massa, Morocco --Tagooty 06:10, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose Left part is hanging a bit to the right --Michielverbeek 06:14, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Llez 06:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I see two contradicting opinions here, so I have put it to discussion. --LexKurochkin 06:41, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Michielverbeek: The left-most wall is in fact leaning to the right. All other walls are vertical. --Tagooty 07:15, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Tagooty: That is exactly what I'm trying to say. Btw, I think it is easy to correct --Michielverbeek 06:29, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Michielverbeek: What I mean is that the left wall is leaning in reality, hence it does not need PC. --Tagooty 06:49, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Tagooty: Please look to the note, imo it needs a small PC --Michielverbeek 06:37, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Michielverbeek: Tweaked PC per your note. Hope it is okay now. --Tagooty 14:13, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Tagooty: Please look to the note, imo it needs a small PC --Michielverbeek 06:37, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Michielverbeek: What I mean is that the left wall is leaning in reality, hence it does not need PC. --Tagooty 06:49, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Tagooty: That is exactly what I'm trying to say. Btw, I think it is easy to correct --Michielverbeek 06:29, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Weak support I see, that all the verticals are vertical and, yes, one wall is just not vertical in reality. The building is slightly soft, but proper level of detail is achieved. --LexKurochkin 07:43, 29 October 2025 (UTC)- Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 06:55, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --LexKurochkin 07:43, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Dülmen,_Kirchspiel,_Dernekamp,_Feldweg_--_2025_--_0164.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Dirt road in the Dernekamp hamlet, Kirchspiel, Dülmen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany --XRay 05:23, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose Blurry throughout, sorry --Tagooty 07:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Done I have improved the sharpness and think that the photo is good enough for QI (even taking the resolution into account). --XRay 07:56, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info Sorry but it does not appear better to me. IMO, for this view, a drone is not required, a similar view of much higher quality could be obtained by a handheld camera. --Tagooty 06:52, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Blurry and there are blown out areas. --Lmbuga 06:53, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- I can understand the comment about blurriness, as the camera on a mini drone like this is not comparable to an SLR. But where are the blown-out areas? --XRay 07:17, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- I contribute here by trying to be honest and welcoming, but I am not a professional, nor perhaps even an advanced amateur. However, the path at the bottom of the photo and everything below it lacks adequate detail, in my opinion, blurry. Wouldn't you agree?--Lmbuga 14:26, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Blown out areas: Considering only the most obvious areas, look at the tree on the right and notice that to its right there is a yellow strip where there is no data in everything. Sorry. IMHO. --Lmbuga 14:35, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Perhaps it would have been better to say ‘overexposed areas’ (there are many of those).--Lmbuga 14:42, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Done I can't find overexposed areas. The histogram is OK. But I reduced the midtone lights. BTW: IMO it's still sharp enough with respect to the resolution. --XRay 14:52, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 07:12, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Closed_wing_resting_activity_of_Lethe_vindhya_(C._&_R._Felder,_1859)_-_Black_Forester_WLB_DSC_8190.jpg
[edit]_-_Black_Forester_WLB_DSC_8190.jpg)
- Nomination Closed wing resting activity of Lethe vindhya (C. & R. Felder, 1859) - Black Forester. By User:Rijuroy89 --Atudu 01:20, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:06, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor quality, textures lacking detail. Compression highly wisible, but ISO is low, so quality could be better. --Gower 17:07, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Compression artefacts.--Peulle 07:49, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 07:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Le_Monument_français_de_1897_à_Tournai.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Le Monument français de 1897 Place de Lille à Tournai --JackyM59 17:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Done Ok, but needs perspective correction --Imehling 18:29, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Comment A bit dark at left, but I would support if perspective is improved, per Imehling. --Sebring12Hrs 22:32, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info Thanks for the advices --JackyM59 08:43, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Done Corrections done --JackyM59 16:27, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The perspective wasn't improved in the second version. In addition, the crop you did, doesn't convince me. If you decide to go to CR, I have to decline, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs 20:38, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The statue is too soft, the head is blurry without details. Sorry. --LexKurochkin 07:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 07:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Blastocerus_dichotomus_in_Jardim_Zoológico_de_Curitiba.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Marsh deer (Blastocerus dichotomus) --Wilfredor 14:05, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose A little backlit and shadow are a little distracting, especially on the face. --Polinova 15:11, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support The shadow on the head is really distracting, but it is an animal, it would not be posing for ideal shot. Backlit works to show fur. The photo is not ideal, but IMO good enough for QI. Let's discuss. --LexKurochkin 12:26, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- weak support Not sure about the white balance; it seems a bit off, but that could be the actual colour of the river. Sharpness is fine.--Peulle 07:48, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --LexKurochkin 06:56, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
File:St._Francis_of_Assisi_Church._2_Franciszkańska_street,_Old_Town,_Kraków,_Poland.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination St. Francis of Assisi Church, 2 Franciszkańska street, Old Town, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 13:50, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:02, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Compression visible on the sky. Bottom cropped a bit tight. --Gower 12:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --LexKurochkin 06:58, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
File:2025-07-06_UEFA_Women_EM_BS_011.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination These XXL soccer balls were found everywhere, in select corners of the city. Here's an example, in front of the Spielzeug Welten Museum Basel. By --Ahmet Düz 04:42, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Comment chromatic aberrations --Jakubhal 05:47, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support CA are negligible IMO --MB-one 13:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose I disagree --Jakubhal 11:02, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Tilted and it needs perspective correction--Lmbuga 06:58, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 06:59, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Rakowice_Cemetery,_tomb_of_Boguszowie_family,_26_Rakowicka_street,_Kraków,_Poland.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination 2025, Kraków, Cmentarz Rakowicki --Igor123121 19:09, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Comment Dust spot. See note. Otherwise good. --Sebring12Hrs 12:35, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Not done in 8 days. --Peulle 12:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs: Done --Igor123121 18:51, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose I didn't notice it, but the sky is posterized. --Sebring12Hrs 16:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Sebring12Hrs 16:07, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Former_Kraków_Główny_railway_station,_1844_design._Peter_Rosenbaum,_1-3_Jan_Nowak-Jeziorański_Square,_Kraków,_Poland.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Former Kraków Główny railway station, 1844 design. Peter Rosenbaum, 1-3 Jan Nowak-Jeziorański square, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 16:48, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Dust spots, posterized sky, noisy artifacts in the sky... --Sebring12Hrs 17:06, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs: Done --Igor123121 17:46, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info Please don't cancel my vote, there is still posterization. --Sebring12Hrs 18:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs:
- Oppose Artefacts of digital processing and manual editing in the sky and near roof left corner --LexKurochkin 08:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → 
Declined --Sebring12Hrs 19:09, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Declined --Sebring12Hrs 19:09, 30 October 2025 (UTC)File:"Europejski"_Hotel,_5_Lubicz_street,_Kraków,_Poland.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination "Europejski" Hotel, 5 Lubicz street, Kraków, Poland --Igor123121 16:48, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose Underexposed. --Sebring12Hrs 17:07, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs: Done --Igor123121 17:46, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info Please don't cancel my vote, there is chroma noise everywhere. --Sebring12Hrs 18:36, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs:
- Oppose Visible noise. --LexKurochkin 08:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose It seems that the focus here is on the lamp post, which is obviously not the main subject of the image. -- Екатерина Борисова 00:58, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 06:55, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Nashville_warbler_immature_with_a_caterpillar_(53683).jpg
[edit].jpg)
- Nomination Immature Nashville warbler with a caterpillar --Rhododendrites 16:30, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. Beautifully caught! --AFBorchert 16:48, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Very good, but something happened with the background, it has grid-like diagonal structures somewhere. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Gower: I cannot follow you here. I do not see that. --AFBorchert 23:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Mainly at the upper left-hand corner, I think. --Harlock81 17:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Gower: I cannot follow you here. I do not see that. --AFBorchert 23:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support I see no problem with the background. DOF is questionable, but the head is sharp. --LexKurochkin 07:14, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Interesting caught; the bird is sharp. Good also for me. --Harlock81 17:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good quality -- Giles Laurent 20:24, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --LexKurochkin 06:53, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Efremov_-_2025_-_chicory_flower.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Cichorium intybus in Yefremov --Юрий Д.К. 13:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose Petals burned out, lacking detail. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info Not burned out, natural colors of the flower at bright sunlight. I don't understand which details do you want to see on this simple flower. --Юрий Д.К. 17:40, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I understand, but clipping on petals is significant and it can be reduced in postprocessing. --Gower 17:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Neutral I like it, but too little and per Gower--Lmbuga 14:51, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --LexKurochkin 08:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
File:La_Seine_musicale_(84847).jpg
[edit].jpg)
- Nomination La Seine vue du jardin de la Seine Musicale-- JackyM59 08:30, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment PC is needed. --Sebring12Hrs 09:16, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your advise --JackyM59 15:15, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, perspective is ok, but sharpness is borderline. --Sebring12Hrs 17:08, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for your advise --JackyM59 15:15, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Clouds look oversharpened, many buildings are overexposed (white without details). --LexKurochkin 08:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Sebring12Hrs 19:08, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Declined --Sebring12Hrs 19:08, 30 October 2025 (UTC)File:Осенние_листья_в_Санкт-Петербурге_02.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Leaves in autumn in Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 23:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose Lacking detail, sorry. --Gower 17:13, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- What kind of details do you miss here? --Екатерина Борисова 01:09, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose In my opinion, the photo lacks detail. This is partly due to the use of a smartphone, which tends to produce something of a posterization effect. Unfortunately, the technical limitations of a smartphone quickly become apparent when it comes to fine details. --XRay 08:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for useful explanation. -- Екатерина Борисова 01:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The scene is beautiful, but something is missing: detail, naturalness..., sorry I can't say exactly what it is. That happens to me all the time. There are many photos that I do not upload for that reason. Now, the photo is beautiful, and if you manage to alter it a little to make it more artistic, you could sell it for a high price.--Lmbuga 07:38, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? --XRay 08:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Passerelle_Nord.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Passerelle Nord vue du jardin de la Seine Musicale --JackyM59 20:43, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose PC is needed + bad sharpness/overprocessing by smartphone software. --Sebring12Hrs 21:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, my smartphone is not enough good. --JackyM59 09:14, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info Some equipment just unable to produce QI (many smartphones, simple low quality lenses, etc.). Several Xiaomi models can take photos in RAW mode, if it is the case, try to process them yourself. Actually camera-JPEG is a bad idea even for some professional-level SLRs. --LexKurochkin 07:27, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, my smartphone is not enough good. --JackyM59 09:14, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Declined --Sebring12Hrs 08:05, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Declined --Sebring12Hrs 08:05, 30 October 2025 (UTC)File:Villa_Ispahan,_Monaco.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Villa Ispahan, Monaco. -- Florent Abel 23:42, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
- PC is needed at right. --Sebring12Hrs 22:45, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Done --Florent Abel 00:40, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose More distance is needed. The distortion caused by the perspective correction at the top is excessive. --Lmbuga 23:27, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Narrow street.--Florent Abel 03:26, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Photo already taken from the largest possible distance. Better perspecitve would require a drone, or taking the picture from a window of the neighboring building. Still, could compress the upper part a bit (did that here: https://ibb.co/qMk1tcyd), but though that would look better, it would be a manipulation. --Plozessor 03:47, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Lmbuga. The building seems to be turned inside out, and both domes on the turrets, which are onion-shaped in the original, look wildly lopsided here. -- Екатерина Борисова 01:47, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Lmbuga and Екатерина Борисова. The crop also looks inadequate for the subject (its lower part). --LexKurochkin 07:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- I have even requested access to houses to take photographs.--Lmbuga 14:56, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Sebring12Hrs 08:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Declined --Sebring12Hrs 08:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC)File:El_Kbob_Mosque.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination El Kbob Mosque is a mosque for worship and educational purposesThis is a photo of the protected monument identified by the ID 82-86 in Tunisia.I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:This image was uploaded as part of Wiki Loves Monuments 2025. --Bill.pix 21:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --JackyM59 21:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice photo, but not QI IMO: CAs (door), noise (or something else, sky), building cropped on the right side. The sky seems subexposed and not natural. Overprocesed IMO --Lmbuga 22:50, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Weak Support Really tight crop, but I think, exposure is ok for the sunlit white parts of the building. Some small remains of CA exist, but not disturbing in A4 size. --Smial 12:53, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Strong noise in the sky and cropped out right part of building. --LexKurochkin 11:59, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → More votes? --LexKurochkin 11:59, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Ambrussum_-_Pont.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Ambrussum_-_Pont--JackyM59 07:42, 26 octobre 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose Categories missing, geo location missing, a lot of dark shadows. Please try to fix it. --XRay 09:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Catégories done --JackyM59 13:52, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, no. You added randomly categories, most of the red links. --XRay 08:00, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry that the photo ended up in the discussion. I made a mistake with the comment. --XRay 08:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline? --XRay 08:32, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Ambrussum_-_Remparts_Celtes.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Ambrussum - Remparts Celtes--JackyM59 07:42, 26 octobre 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --Gower 12:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Please add the categories first. --XRay 13:46, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs: Please have a look to the categories. They are not fixed. --XRay 08:02, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Comment "Category:Ambrussum" is ok, but the others are too broad. I agree. --Sebring12Hrs 11:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --Sebring12Hrs 11:53, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Left_Front_Concorde_F-WTSA_Musee_Delta_Oct25_A7CR_07973.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Left front view, Concorde F-WTSA at Musée Delta, Athis Mons --Tagooty 08:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 11:20, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose A bit noisy, a bit underexposed, a bit unsharp at left, and not the best crop. I would like to hear other opinions. --Sebring12Hrs 15:27, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Improved exposure and sharpness, NR in sky --Tagooty 18:25, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support IMO OK, may be a touch too dark. --XRay 08:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted --Sebring12Hrs 19:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Promoted --Sebring12Hrs 19:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC)File:2025-07-06_UEFA_Women_EM_BS_030.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Ball course with games and interactive stations in Basel. By --Ahmet Düz 08:30, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:37, 26 October 2025 (UTC) Oppose There are some CAs and too much noise --Jakubhal 19:40, 26 October 2025 (UTC) Oppose noisy and dark. Odd composition (what is top third of photo?) --E bailey 12:13, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:46, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
}}
File:OutDoor_2018,_Friedrichshafen_(1X7A0261).jpg
[edit].jpg)
- Nomination Patagonia executive Ryan Gellert at OutDoor 2018 --MB-one 08:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
- Weak oppose Good technical quality but I don't think it's a QI with this arm cut on the left --Benjism89 09:38, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 11:20, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info I'd like to read other comments about the left crop, I'm quite undecided myself. --Benjism89 20:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose because of the crop.--Peulle 08:03, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Peulle Jakubhal 11:09, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined --Sebring12Hrs 19:05, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Declined --Sebring12Hrs 19:05, 30 October 2025 (UTC)File:Drogheda_Highlanes_Gallery_“View_of_Drogheda_from_Ball's_Grove”_by_Gabrielle_Ricciardelli_2024_08_23.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Landscape painting of Drogheda, Co. Louth, Ireland, by Gabrielle Ricciardelli c. 1753/1755. Panorama based on 21 frames. --AFBorchert 08:51, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:05, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose The right edge is blurred. I would like to hear other opinions. --Sebring12Hrs 13:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Everything is sharp enough to me. I do not see problems with sharpness. --LexKurochkin 07:39, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support I agree with Sebring12Hrs that the right-hand border of the frame is not sharp, but the painting does not show the same problem. Over the bar for me. --Harlock81 17:30, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support per Harlock --- Giles Laurent 20:22, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? --LexKurochkin 06:48, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Oeufs_d'encornets_sur_une_plage_d'Hardelot.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Oeufs d'encornets sur une plage d'Hardelot --JackyM59 17:28, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
Good, but without categories--Lmbuga 18:10, 23 October 2025 (UTC) Support Good quality. Categories were added by the author. --Lvova 12:38, 25 October 2025 (UTC) Oppose Unidentified subject: Category:Céphalopodes. Études générales is a liefalse. I hope to hear from the user, but I think this is serious. The other category is Category:Mollusca. Very insufficient. Credible?--Lmbuga 21:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)- Correction to the previous comment caused by poor English--Lmbuga 09:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:44, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Himalayan_Tahr_at_Sagarmatha_National_Park,_Nepal_01.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Male Himalayan Tahr (hemitragus jemlahicus) at the Sagarmatha National Park in Nepal. by User:Gurung pratap --UnpetitproleX 12:40, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion Oppose Looks overprocessed to me, per my feedback on FPC --Poco a poco 14:21, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- May not be a FP, but I don't think it lacks in quality (compared to other images here). --UnpetitproleX 20:48, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Parts of the face is blurred, and the established standard at QIC is that the face of the animal should be in focus, sorry.--Peulle 12:56, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, it's badly overprocessed, sorry, --Poco a poco 20:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:43, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
File:1011_Pont_du_Gard_Photo_by_Giles_Laurent.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Aerial view of Pont du Gard, France (1) --Giles Laurent 00:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Implicite support. --Harlock81 09:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- In my opinion, a PC is necessary. --Lmbuga 00:26, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good now. --Sebring12Hrs 19:38, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Sebring12Hrs. --Harlock81 09:21, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info The Mavic Mini 4 Pro produces 48MP photos from a very tiny 1/1.3-inch sensor. You can not expect the pictures from this sensor to have the same sharpness and detail as a Full frame sensor. A picture should not be judged harder only because it has more MP in my opinion. Anyway I have uploaded a new version that demonstrates my point, you will see that with 50% size it doesn't look "overprocessed" anymore. That is the only way to have pictures with this sharpness with the Mavic Mini 4 Pro. What do you think of the new version Sebring12Hrs and Harlock81? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 15:23, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Reducing the resolution is not the solution, it's like sweeping the dust under the rug to hide. And if the problem comes from the camera, well that's it. Jacek Halicki's photos (he has a drone of the same brand but not the same model as his), make superb photos, why and how, I don't know, but the result has nothing to do with it. There we see throughout the photo that there is a problem, the textures are not at all natural, the trees, the stones, the water, the buildings, this is even more visible in the background. It looks like a kind of digital painting that has nothing to do with a photo, sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebring12Hrs (talk • contribs)
- Jacek Halicki's photos are taken with the DJI Air which has a much lower resolution than the Mavic Mini 4 Pro because it only has 12MP instead of 48MP. And a 12MP photo will always look sharper than a 48MP photo. This exactly demonstrates what I have said above. Also if you look for example at this image from Jacek you will see no higher sharpness than the the present image. So the present candidate is way above the QI bar in my opinion. -- Giles Laurent 15:55, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explantion and the examples. However, I put it in a different way. If I take a picture with the camera of my phone, is it judged considering the camera capacity or evaluating the overall result? Of course, there is not a unique answer. In the best case, I think both. In this case, I understand that we are discussing about a limit of the instrumentation. Yet, it is difficult to say that the result is really good at the highest resolution. I would like to hear other opinions, and I might change also mine later. --Harlock81 16:15, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Harlock81 the reason I mentioned the material is because the DJI Mavic 4 Pro produces 48MP and the DJI Air produces 12MP photos. 12MP photos will always look much sharper than 48MP photos and therefore in my opinion a 48MP photo should not be judged harder than the 12MP version of it. Also, could you please check the updated version of the file? (Press CTRL+F5 on PC or Command+Shift+R on Mac with file open to refresh cache and view the new version) Thank you in advance. -- Giles Laurent 17:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Giles Laurent: I did, and I find the new version better than the other. However, after reading your point of you, I'm asking myself if the downscaling is really necessary. As said, I would like to hear other opinions. --Harlock81 (talk) 21:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Harlock81 if you think the image is now better do you still oppose (have you forgotten to update your previous votes to strike them?) ? If you don't oppose anymore, I would appreciate if you could update your votes, thank you in advance! -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:21, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Giles Laurent: I did, and I find the new version better than the other. However, after reading your point of you, I'm asking myself if the downscaling is really necessary. As said, I would like to hear other opinions. --Harlock81 (talk) 21:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- I disagree, some 50 Mpx cameras take better pictures than DJI Mavic. --Sebring12Hrs 17:52, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Sebring12Hrs, I already explained that Full frame cameras can't be compared to tiny 1/1.3-inch sensor. Please try to link any 50mp drone picture made with a 1/1.3-inch sensor with higher detail and you will see it doesn't exist. -- Giles Laurent 18:30, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Comment If your equipment cannot take quality photos, that is not a reason to give it a pass, meaning that you should be less strict with the photos coming from your drone compared to 45 Mpx devices which take good ones. Sorry, but your arguments don't suit me at all. And again sorry, at worst others will give their opinion. --Sebring12Hrs 20:03, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- You don't seem to understand that it is not a question of equipment that I have or don't have but a question of physics in the realm of what is possible today with today's technology. The bigger the sensor in a camera, the more information it is able to record. If you have one 1/1.3-inch sensor that does 12 MP and a second 1/1.3-inch sensor that does 48 MP, the 12 MP photo taken in the 1/1.3-inch sensor will always look sharper than the 48 MP one. A 1/1.3-inch sensor is much smaller than a Full frame sensor and will always record less information than a full frame sensor.
- You have talked about Jacek Halicki's drone photos. He uses a drone that does 12 MP photos, this means the 12 MP photo will look sharper than a 48 MP photo out of another drone with same sensor size than his drone.
- If you compare this present candidate in the new updated 12 MP version (Press CTRL+F5 on PC or Command+Shift+R on Mac with file open to refresh cache and view the new version) you will find it sharper and more detailed than the 12 MP shots from Jacek that you take for reference for QI bar of drone shot.
- In summary, the old version of the present candidate was already of QI level to me and with the new version of the present candidate it is even way more above QI level in my opinion -- Giles Laurent 20:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Click here for a side by side comparison -- Giles Laurent 21:02, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Sebring12Hrs, I already explained that Full frame cameras can't be compared to tiny 1/1.3-inch sensor. Please try to link any 50mp drone picture made with a 1/1.3-inch sensor with higher detail and you will see it doesn't exist. -- Giles Laurent 18:30, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Harlock81 the reason I mentioned the material is because the DJI Mavic 4 Pro produces 48MP and the DJI Air produces 12MP photos. 12MP photos will always look much sharper than 48MP photos and therefore in my opinion a 48MP photo should not be judged harder than the 12MP version of it. Also, could you please check the updated version of the file? (Press CTRL+F5 on PC or Command+Shift+R on Mac with file open to refresh cache and view the new version) Thank you in advance. -- Giles Laurent 17:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the explantion and the examples. However, I put it in a different way. If I take a picture with the camera of my phone, is it judged considering the camera capacity or evaluating the overall result? Of course, there is not a unique answer. In the best case, I think both. In this case, I understand that we are discussing about a limit of the instrumentation. Yet, it is difficult to say that the result is really good at the highest resolution. I would like to hear other opinions, and I might change also mine later. --Harlock81 16:15, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Jacek Halicki's photos are taken with the DJI Air which has a much lower resolution than the Mavic Mini 4 Pro because it only has 12MP instead of 48MP. And a 12MP photo will always look sharper than a 48MP photo. This exactly demonstrates what I have said above. Also if you look for example at this image from Jacek you will see no higher sharpness than the the present image. So the present candidate is way above the QI bar in my opinion. -- Giles Laurent 15:55, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Oppose Per others. After rereading everything, I think the photo is useful for Wikimedia Commons, but that the instrument used is not suitable for QI. I insist that perspective correction is needed.--Lmbuga 21:29, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Lmbuga so according to you all shots from a Mavic Mini 4 Pro can't be QI just because the drone records the image in 48MP instead of 12MP? There is a setting in the drone to record the image directly in 12 MP instead of 48 MP, I don't see why this couldn't be used or why it wouldn't be possible to reduce the picture size to match the 12 MP of drones that only have the 12 MP option. Regarding the perspective correction I don't think that's needed for a drone shot, this is normal perspective -- Giles Laurent 22:31, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info @Harlock81, Lmbuga and Sebring12Hrs, I was mistaken and Jacek's drone is the DJI Air 3S (FC9113 camera is the DJI Air 3S wide-angle camera). The DJI Air 3S wide angle camera native resolution is 8192 x 6144 (50 MP) but Jacek's uploads are approximately 4000 pixels wide or less, which means they were all reduced in size by 50%. This once again completely demonstrates what I was saying. The only way to have a sharp shot with any 50MP drone is by downsizing it. So can you please explain why you think Jacek's reduced size shots are acceptable but not the present candidates? Should honesty be discouraged and candidates that admit reducing image size be disadvantaged over those who don’t say anything so that no one sees it? Please look this side by side comparison. To me the present candidate is clearly of QI and I don't see why one user would be allowed to reduce the size of his drone shots to 12 MP and not other ones. To be clear, I'm not saying Jacek's drone photos shouldn't be QI, they rightfully are. I'm saying that the present candidate should also be QI and should also be allowed to be in 50% since other users do that too -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:00, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Plozessor, I don't see where you see "lack of detail" because I see all individual leafs of the closest trees from the left and right side. ISO 100 or ISO 150 have barely no difference at all and yes 1/3200s was necessary because a slower shutter speed would have resulted in blown highlights. -- Giles Laurent 08:24, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- The "Lack of detail" can be debated - it's probably ok for that type of camera, though on other pictures of that same bridge, the structure and the individual bricks are much more visible. Still it's somehow overprocessed/overcontrasted (visible at the leaves and also at the water edges) and there's the tilt of course. But ... why do you think that with ISO 100 and 1/2000s the highlights would blow and with ISO 150 and 1/3200s they would not? --Plozessor 15:38, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Plozessor I'm sorry but you can not compare a photo taken from 10m distance to a photo taken at 150 m distance. Also you can not compare visibility of tiles for a picture taken with the sun high which casts shadows between tiles to a picture taken at golden hour in winter with a much lower sun illuminating the holes between the tiles. The monument in this photo has more than enough detail considering the distance of the subject and lighting situation and is well above QI bar. I don't see oversharpening on the leafs and if that is the only issue that can easily be softened. Mathematically if exposure is perfect at ISO 150 and shutter speed 1/3200, you could use a shutter speed as slow as 1/2133.33 and anything lower would be inevitably cause overexposure so 1/2000s in this situation in combination with ISO 100 would overexpose because cameras don't have a 1/2133.33 setting. So it would be a setting of 1/2500s to go for a ISO 100. However as I have already explained, there is barely no difference at all between ISO 150 1/3200s and ISO 100 1/2500s so that would make no visual difference. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:34, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Giles Laurent Saw your new version and I'm still not too happy with the look of the trees (it just looks overcontrasted/artificial to me), but overall it is much better now, so that I have at least removed my opposing vote. Btw, does this camera store raw files and would you have that for this image? --Plozessor 03:25, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Plozessor I'm sorry but you can not compare a photo taken from 10m distance to a photo taken at 150 m distance. Also you can not compare visibility of tiles for a picture taken with the sun high which casts shadows between tiles to a picture taken at golden hour in winter with a much lower sun illuminating the holes between the tiles. The monument in this photo has more than enough detail considering the distance of the subject and lighting situation and is well above QI bar. I don't see oversharpening on the leafs and if that is the only issue that can easily be softened. Mathematically if exposure is perfect at ISO 150 and shutter speed 1/3200, you could use a shutter speed as slow as 1/2133.33 and anything lower would be inevitably cause overexposure so 1/2000s in this situation in combination with ISO 100 would overexpose because cameras don't have a 1/2133.33 setting. So it would be a setting of 1/2500s to go for a ISO 100. However as I have already explained, there is barely no difference at all between ISO 150 1/3200s and ISO 100 1/2500s so that would make no visual difference. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 19:34, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Plozessor, I don't see where you see "lack of detail" because I see all individual leafs of the closest trees from the left and right side. ISO 100 or ISO 150 have barely no difference at all and yes 1/3200s was necessary because a slower shutter speed would have resulted in blown highlights. -- Giles Laurent 08:24, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I think uploading a 12MP is acceptable here: neither the Mavic Mini Pro 4 nor the Mavic Air 3S have true 48MP sensors, at least in the conventional sense. They use Sony's Quad Bayer tech, which groups adjacent pixels in 2x2 groups. By default, these drones take 12MP images by using each 2x2 group as a pixel but also have an option to take 48MP shots by using each individual pixel. I gave up using the 48MP option because I didn't think the little extra detail made up for the increased interpolation errors and reduced dynamic range, but your mileage may vary. In any case, I agree with others that your 12MP looks over-processed (sharpening halos and noise reduction smudges), it should be possible to get a cleaner image out of this sensor. --Julesvernex2 21:57, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Julesvernex2 thank you for your comment. It's good to see someone with technical knowledge. Thank you for acknowledging that drones with 48 MP quad bayer sensors shouldn't have their images necessarily in 48 MP and that 12 MP is acceptable in such cases. I've just uploaded right now a new reworked version with no sharpening, only selective denoise on some areas (Press CTRL+F5 on PC or Command+Shift+R on Mac with file open to refresh cache and view the new version). Could you please tell me what you think of it? Thank you in advance! -- Giles Laurent 22:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks Giles, I think that looks better and on par with what can be expected from a Type 1/1.3 sensor. Any strong reason not to correct the perspective? It often looks weird on drone shots, but it may work well for some of the images on this series? --Julesvernex2 15:34, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Julesvernex2 thank you for your comment. It's good to see someone with technical knowledge. Thank you for acknowledging that drones with 48 MP quad bayer sensors shouldn't have their images necessarily in 48 MP and that 12 MP is acceptable in such cases. I've just uploaded right now a new reworked version with no sharpening, only selective denoise on some areas (Press CTRL+F5 on PC or Command+Shift+R on Mac with file open to refresh cache and view the new version). Could you please tell me what you think of it? Thank you in advance! -- Giles Laurent 22:52, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Here, we’re not judging only the end result regardless of how it was made—technique matters. Approving this image as-is would encourage downscaled submissions. Technically, it also needs vertical correction, the wide-angle lens has introduced keystone distortion. In architectural photography, keeping verticals straight is essential. --Wilfredor 14:48, 28 October 2025 (UTC) Support IMHO the picture is better now with the perspective fix --Wilfredor 02:14, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- I disagree with that last bit: some images benefit from straight verticals, others don't. --Julesvernex2 18:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Done, new reworked version just uploaded with perspective correction done (Press CTRL+F5 on PC or Command+Shift+R on Mac with file open to refresh cache and view the new version). What do you think now Harlock81, Lmbuga, Sebring12Hrs, Julesvernex2 and Wilfredor? -- Giles Laurent 20:15, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for keeping at it! --Julesvernex2 21:40, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Now the photo is good. Thank you for the perspective correction. --Lmbuga 09:03, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Sebring12Hrs 19:38, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
File:1012_Pont_du_Gard_Photo_by_Giles_Laurent.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Aerial view of Pont du Gard, France (2) --Giles Laurent 00:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Implicite support. --Harlock81 09:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- In my opinion, a PC is necessary. --Lmbuga 00:26, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Absolutely ok now. Thanks all for the explanations and it was finally constructive. --Sebring12Hrs 19:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Sebring12Hrs. --Harlock81 09:21, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info The Mavic Mini 4 Pro produces 48MP photos from a very tiny 1/1.3-inch sensor. You can not expect the pictures from this sensor to have the same sharpness and detail as a Full frame sensor. A picture should not be judged harder only because it has more MP in my opinion. Anyway I have uploaded a new version that demonstrates my point, you will see that with 50% size it doesn't look "overprocessed" anymore. That is the only way to have pictures with this sharpness with the Mavic Mini 4 Pro. What do you think of the new version Sebring12Hrs and Harlock81? -- Giles Laurent 15:23, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Reducing the resolution is not the solution, it's like sweeping the dust under the rug to hide. And if the problem comes from the camera, well that's it. Jacek Halicki's photos (he has a drone of the same brand but not the same model as his), make superb photos, why and how, I don't know, but the result has nothing to do with it. There we see throughout the photo that there is a problem, the textures are not at all natural, the trees, the stones, the water, the buildings, this is even more visible in the background. It looks like a kind of digital painting that has nothing to do with a photo, sorry.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebring12Hrs (talk • contribs)
- Jacek Halicki's photos are taken with the DJI Air which has a much lower resolution than the Mavic Mini 4 Pro because it only has 12MP instead of 48MP. And a 12MP photo will always look sharper than a 48MP photo. This exactly demonstrates what I have said above. Also if you look for example at this image from Jacek you will see no higher sharpness than the the present image. So the present candidate is way above the QI bar in my opinion. -- Giles Laurent 15:57, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Click here for a side by side comparison -- Giles Laurent 21:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Jacek Halicki's photos are taken with the DJI Air which has a much lower resolution than the Mavic Mini 4 Pro because it only has 12MP instead of 48MP. And a 12MP photo will always look sharper than a 48MP photo. This exactly demonstrates what I have said above. Also if you look for example at this image from Jacek you will see no higher sharpness than the the present image. So the present candidate is way above the QI bar in my opinion. -- Giles Laurent 15:57, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. After rereading everything, I think the photo is useful for Wikimedia Commons, but that the instrument used is not suitable for QI. I insist that perspective correction is needed.--Lmbuga 21:30, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Lmbuga so according to you all shots from a Mavic Mini 4 Pro can't be QI just because the drone records the image in 48MP instead of 12MP? There is a setting in the drone to record the image directly in 12 MP instead of 48 MP, I don't see why this couldn't be used or why it wouldn't be possible to reduce the picture size to match the 12 MP of drones that only have the 12 MP option. Regarding the perspective correction I don't think that's needed for a drone shot, this is normal perspective. Anyway, the perspective was edited in this shot to see how it looks and it seems you don't even see the difference with and without perspective correction so why would you require it? If the perspective still isn't right in your eyes please tell me exactly what is the problem according to you. -- Giles Laurent 22:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info @Harlock81, Lmbuga and Sebring12Hrs, I was mistaken and Jacek's drone is the DJI Air 3S (FC9113 camera is the DJI Air 3S wide-angle camera). The DJI Air 3S wide angle camera native resolution is 8192 x 6144 (50 MP) but Jacek's uploads are approximately 4000 pixels wide or less, which means they were all reduced in size by 50%. This once again completely demonstrates what I was saying. The only way to have a sharp shot with any 50MP drone is by downsizing it. So can you please explain why you think Jacek's reduced size shots are acceptable but not the present candidates? Should honesty be discouraged and candidates that admit reducing image size be disadvantaged over those who don’t say anything so that no one sees it? Please look this side by side comparison. To me the present candidate is clearly of QI and I don't see why one user would be allowed to reduce the size of his drone shots to 12 MP and not other ones. To be clear, I'm not saying Jacek's drone photos shouldn't be QI, they rightfully are. I'm saying that the present candidate should also be QI and should also be allowed to be in 50% since other users do that too -- Giles Laurent 23:02, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Done, new reworked version just uploaded with perspective correction done (Press CTRL+F5 on PC or Command+Shift+R on Mac with file open to refresh cache and view the new version). What do you think now Harlock81, Lmbuga, Sebring12Hrs, Julesvernex2 and Wilfredor? -- Giles Laurent 20:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Julesvernex2 21:42, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Support Good picture IMO--Lmbuga 09:08, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Sebring12Hrs 19:36, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
File:1013_Pont_du_Gard_Photo_by_Giles_Laurent.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Aerial view of Pont du Gard, France (3) --Giles Laurent 00:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Implicite support. --Harlock81 09:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- In my opinion, a PC is necessary. --Lmbuga 00:26, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Now good, thanks ! --Sebring12Hrs 19:32, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Sebring12Hrs. --Harlock81 09:21, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info The Mavic Mini 4 Pro produces 48MP photos from a very tiny 1/1.3-inch sensor. You can not expect the pictures from this sensor to have the same sharpness and detail as a Full frame sensor. A picture should not be judged harder only because it has more MP in my opinion. Anyway I have uploaded a new version that demonstrates my point, you will see that with 50% size it doesn't look "overprocessed" anymore. That is the only way to have pictures with this sharpness with the Mavic Mini 4 Pro. What do you think of the new version Sebring12Hrs and Harlock81? -- Giles Laurent 15:23, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Reducing the resolution is not the solution, it's like sweeping the dust under the rug to hide. And if the problem comes from the camera, well that's it. Jacek Halicki's photos (he has a drone of the same brand but not the same model as his), make superb photos, why and how, I don't know, but the result has nothing to do with it. There we see throughout the photo that there is a problem, the textures are not at all natural, the trees, the stones, the water, the buildings, this is even more visible in the background. It looks like a kind of digital painting that has nothing to do with a photo, sorry.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebring12Hrs (talk • contribs)
- Jacek Halicki's photos are taken with the DJI Air which has a much lower resolution than the Mavic Mini 4 Pro because it only has 12MP instead of 48MP. And a 12MP photo will always look sharper than a 48MP photo. This exactly demonstrates what I have said above. Also if you look for example at this image from Jacek you will see no higher sharpness than the the present image. So the present candidate is way above the QI bar in my opinion. -- Giles Laurent 15:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Click here for a side by side comparison -- Giles Laurent 21:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Jacek Halicki's photos are taken with the DJI Air which has a much lower resolution than the Mavic Mini 4 Pro because it only has 12MP instead of 48MP. And a 12MP photo will always look sharper than a 48MP photo. This exactly demonstrates what I have said above. Also if you look for example at this image from Jacek you will see no higher sharpness than the the present image. So the present candidate is way above the QI bar in my opinion. -- Giles Laurent 15:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
*
Oppose Per others. After rereading everything, I think the photo is useful for Wikimedia Commons, but that the instrument used is not suitable for QI. I insist that perspective correction is needed.--Lmbuga 21:34, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Lmbuga so according to you all shots from a Mavic Mini 4 Pro can't be QI just because the drone records the image in 48MP instead of 12MP? There is a setting in the drone to record the image directly in 12 MP instead of 48 MP, I don't see why this couldn't be used or why it wouldn't be possible to reduce the picture size to match the 12 MP of drones that only have the 12 MP option. Regarding the perspective correction I don't think that's needed for a drone shot, this is normal perspective -- Giles Laurent 22:37, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info @Harlock81, Lmbuga and Sebring12Hrs, I was mistaken and Jacek's drone is the DJI Air 3S (FC9113 camera is the DJI Air 3S wide-angle camera). The DJI Air 3S wide angle camera native resolution is 8192 x 6144 (50 MP) but Jacek's uploads are approximately 4000 pixels wide or less, which means they were all reduced in size by 50%. This once again completely demonstrates what I was saying. The only way to have a sharp shot with any 50MP drone is by downsizing it. So can you please explain why you think Jacek's reduced size shots are acceptable but not the present candidates? Should honesty be discouraged and candidates that admit reducing image size be disadvantaged over those who don’t say anything so that no one sees it? Please look this side by side comparison. To me the present candidate is clearly of QI and I don't see why one user would be allowed to reduce the size of his drone shots to 12 MP and not other ones. To be clear, I'm not saying Jacek's drone photos shouldn't be QI, they rightfully are. I'm saying that the present candidate should also be QI and should also be allowed to be in 50% since other users do that too -- Giles Laurent 23:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Done, new reworked version just uploaded with perspective correction done (Press CTRL+F5 on PC or Command+Shift+R on Mac with file open to refresh cache and view the new version). What do you think now Harlock81, Lmbuga, Sebring12Hrs, Julesvernex2 and Wilfredor? -- Giles Laurent 20:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Comment This one I think was better without the perspective correction --Julesvernex2 21:46, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good picture IMO--Lmbuga 09:14, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Julesvernex2: : I consider that the perspective has been corrected. Please check it again.--Lmbuga 09:31, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- It has. My point was that, due to the distance and angle, this image in particular looked better without perspective correction. Just a personal opinion though, I won't oppose. --Julesvernex2 10:12, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Julesvernex2: : I consider that the perspective has been corrected. Please check it again.--Lmbuga 09:31, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Sebring12Hrs 19:32, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
File:1015_Pont_du_Gard_Photo_by_Giles_Laurent.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Aerial view of Pont du Gard, France (4) --Giles Laurent 00:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Support Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:17, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Implicite support. --Harlock81 09:09, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- In my opinion, a PC is necessary. --Lmbuga 00:52, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Ok now. --Sebring12Hrs 19:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose per Sebring12Hrs. --Harlock81 09:21, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info The Mavic Mini 4 Pro produces 48MP photos from a very tiny 1/1.3-inch sensor. You can not expect the pictures from this sensor to have the same sharpness and detail as a Full frame sensor. A picture should not be judged harder only because it has more MP in my opinion. Anyway I have uploaded a new version that demonstrates my point, you will see that with 50% size it doesn't look "overprocessed" anymore. That is the only way to have pictures with this sharpness with the Mavic Mini 4 Pro. What do you think of the new version Sebring12Hrs and Harlock81? -- Giles Laurent 15:23, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Reducing the resolution is not the solution, it's like sweeping the dust under the rug to hide. And if the problem comes from the camera, well that's it. Jacek Halicki's photos (he has a drone of the same brand but not the same model as his), make superb photos, why and how, I don't know, but the result has nothing to do with it. There we see throughout the photo that there is a problem, the textures are not at all natural, the trees, the stones, the water, the buildings, this is even more visible in the background. It looks like a kind of digital painting that has nothing to do with a photo, sorry.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sebring12Hrs (talk • contribs)
- Jacek Halicki's photos are taken with the DJI Air which has a much lower resolution than the Mavic Mini 4 Pro because it only has 12MP instead of 48MP. And a 12MP photo will always look sharper than a 48MP photo. This exactly demonstrates what I have said above. Also if you look for example at this image from Jacek you will see no higher sharpness than the the present image. So the present candidate is way above the QI bar in my opinion. -- Giles Laurent 15:57, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Click here for a side by side comparison -- Giles Laurent 21:05, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Jacek Halicki's photos are taken with the DJI Air which has a much lower resolution than the Mavic Mini 4 Pro because it only has 12MP instead of 48MP. And a 12MP photo will always look sharper than a 48MP photo. This exactly demonstrates what I have said above. Also if you look for example at this image from Jacek you will see no higher sharpness than the the present image. So the present candidate is way above the QI bar in my opinion. -- Giles Laurent 15:57, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. After rereading everything, I think the photo is useful for Wikimedia Commons, but that the instrument used is not suitable for QI. I insist that perspective correction is needed.--Lmbuga 21:34, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Lmbuga so according to you all shots from a Mavic Mini 4 Pro can't be QI just because the drone records the image in 48MP instead of 12MP? There is a setting in the drone to record the image directly in 12 MP instead of 48 MP, I don't see why this couldn't be used or why it wouldn't be possible to reduce the picture size to match the 12 MP of drones that only have the 12 MP option. Regarding the perspective correction I don't think that's needed for a drone shot, this is normal perspective -- Giles Laurent 22:35, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Info @Harlock81, Lmbuga and Sebring12Hrs, I was mistaken and Jacek's drone is the DJI Air 3S (FC9113 camera is the DJI Air 3S wide-angle camera). The DJI Air 3S wide angle camera native resolution is 8192 x 6144 (50 MP) but Jacek's uploads are approximately 4000 pixels wide or less, which means they were all reduced in size by 50%. This once again completely demonstrates what I was saying. The only way to have a sharp shot with any 50MP drone is by downsizing it. So can you please explain why you think Jacek's reduced size shots are acceptable but not the present candidates? Should honesty be discouraged and candidates that admit reducing image size be disadvantaged over those who don’t say anything so that no one sees it? Please look this side by side comparison. To me the present candidate is clearly of QI and I don't see why one user would be allowed to reduce the size of his drone shots to 12 MP and not other ones. To be clear, I'm not saying Jacek's drone photos shouldn't be QI, they rightfully are. I'm saying that the present candidate should also be QI and should also be allowed to be in 50% since other users do that too -- Giles Laurent 23:04, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Done, new reworked version just uploaded with perspective correction done (Press CTRL+F5 on PC or Command+Shift+R on Mac with file open to refresh cache and view the new version). What do you think now Harlock81, Lmbuga, Sebring12Hrs, Julesvernex2 and Wilfredor? -- Giles Laurent 20:16, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support --Julesvernex2 21:45, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good picture IMO --Lmbuga 09:16, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? --Sebring12Hrs 19:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Kalyan_Minaret_in_Bukhara.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Kalyan Minaret in Bukhara. -- 26D 08:08, 25 October (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 18:09, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Not bad, but there's a halo along the contour of the minaret, and the bottom part of image is blurry. --Екатерина Борисова 00:13, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Perhaps it is a personal issue due to my tastes that I do not like the composition: too tight at the top and cropped at the bottom.--Lmbuga 21:58, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Comment I can't see the halo, I can see blurred edges, but no halo. However, the bottom part of the image is very poor. --Lmbuga 21:47, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Ah!, the halo is visible in the thumbnail, but not in the photo itself?--Lmbuga 21:51, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah, the halo is almost invisible in full size, but it's clearly visible in the thumbnail and in 450 × 600 pixels standard preview. -- Екатерина Борисова 01:27, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- You're right--Lmbuga 15:05, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah, the halo is almost invisible in full size, but it's clearly visible in the thumbnail and in 450 × 600 pixels standard preview. -- Екатерина Борисова 01:27, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Ah!, the halo is visible in the thumbnail, but not in the photo itself?--Lmbuga 21:51, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined --Sebring12Hrs 07:43, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Declined --Sebring12Hrs 07:43, 30 October 2025 (UTC)File:Camelus_bactrianus_skull_in_Jardim_Zoológico_de_Curitiba.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Camelus bactrianus skull in Jardim Zoológico de Curitiba --Wilfredor 01:06, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Nice but background is weird, partially removed, partially not, somewhere with geometric black (bat-like?) shapes. --Gower 21:13, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Too much noisy and overporcessed. --Sebring12Hrs 11:08, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- I uploaded a new version --Wilfredor 13:09, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- It's way better now. Only one spot to correct, I added imagenote. --Gower 18:00, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Done @Gower and Sebring12Hrs: Please take a look te new version. Thanks --Wilfredor 18:34, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- It's way better now. Only one spot to correct, I added imagenote. --Gower 18:00, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- I uploaded a new version --Wilfredor 13:09, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support now it is ok --Gower 20:21, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Too blurred to me. --Sebring12Hrs 22:39, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --Gower 20:22, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
File:The_three_temples_of_Sbeitla_04.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination The three temples of Sbeitla and the arch of Antoninus and Marcus Aurelius in a landscape --IssamBarhoumi 16:31, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Good, but small. --Lvova 15:17, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- dear Lvova I improved the file size and light have a lok please --IssamBarhoumi 20:40, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Thank you. Good quality. --Lvova 10:45, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- dear Lvova I improved the file size and light have a lok please --IssamBarhoumi 20:40, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose @IssamBarhoumi we need EV here, like in first or second. Too dark. --PetarM 09:07, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- dear PetarM I reverted it to the second one ... I thought that with this kind of darkness there will be good focus on the temples but now it is more illuminated hve a look please --IssamBarhoumi 15:21, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- @PetarM I think the revertedfile was hazy although it has better light so I reedit everything to have a new file wit better light and better sharpness have look please --IssamBarhoumi 20:24, 29 October 2025 (UTC)
- dear PetarM I reverted it to the second one ... I thought that with this kind of darkness there will be good focus on the temples but now it is more illuminated hve a look please --IssamBarhoumi 15:21, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → More votes? --Harlock81 09:14, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
File:Farm_tractor.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination A tractor in Nigeria. By user:Sasu photography. --Lvova 19:49, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Decline
- Dust spot in the sky, underexposed, and noisy. And why ISO 400 in bright daylight? --Plozessor 02:57, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good quality. --Umarxon III 21:32, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco.... --Sebring12Hrs 11:01, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Per my initial comment which has not been addressed. --Plozessor 03:20, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Several dust spots (Many dust spots!). Overprocessed, oversaturated and underexposed IMO. Perhaps vignetting--Lmbuga 22:06, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others Jakubhal 20:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Very impressive photo, but noise in the sky, multiple dust spots, shadows are too dark, too blue white balance. Sorry and moral support. --LexKurochkin 06:58, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 5 oppose → Declined --Sebring12Hrs 07:42, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Declined --Sebring12Hrs 07:42, 30 October 2025 (UTC)File:Петергоф,_Нижний_парк,_Оранжерейный_сад,_рудбекия_01.jpg
[edit]
- Nomination Rudbeckia laciniata in Orangery Garden of Lower Park, Peterhof, Saint Petersburg, Russia. --Екатерина Борисова 22:09, 18 October 2025 (UTC)
- Discussion
- Oppose Too messy composition for me, two species together almost mixed. Flowers aren't very detailed. --Gower 06:17, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support The composition is good to me here. And the sharpness acceptable. --Sebring12Hrs 21:10, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
- Weak support Юрий Д.К. 06:12, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sharpness rather below the bar, overexposed areas. And Gower's argument is valid, the description should mention both species --Poco a poco 21:23, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- Comment Gower's argument was about something else, but I've improved the description as far as you're not satisfied with categories only. -- Екатерина Борисова 00:20, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Anna.Massini 12:53, 22 October 2025 (UTC)Anna.Massini
- Support Very nice composition, good lighting, acceptabel sharpness, and now also good image description ;-) --Smial 11:37, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Poco a poco. Sorry. --LexKurochkin 10:06, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose Parts of the flowers are overexposed. Sorry. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Support Good enough quality -- Giles Laurent 20:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Running total: 5 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Promote? --Robert Flogaus-Faust 20:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
Timetable (day 8 after nomination)
[edit]- Wed 22 Oct → Thu 30 Oct
- Thu 23 Oct → Fri 31 Oct
- Fri 24 Oct → Sat 01 Nov
- Sat 25 Oct → Sun 02 Nov
- Sun 26 Oct → Mon 03 Nov
- Mon 27 Oct → Tue 04 Nov
- Tue 28 Oct → Wed 05 Nov
- Wed 29 Oct → Thu 06 Nov
- Thu 30 Oct → Fri 07 Nov